Coronial
QLDaged care

Simons, Kathleen

Deceased

Kathleen Simons

Demographics

96y, female

Date of death

2015-06-23

Finding date

2018-12-19

Cause of death

Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis secondary to infected leg ulcers, complicated by multiple organ failure

AI-generated summary

A 96-year-old woman with diabetes, dementia and a chronic blistering skin condition developed progressively worsening leg ulcers with exposed tendons while resident in an aged care facility. Despite multiple medical reviews between February and June 2015, the wounds were not escalated to hospital care. A tendon was identified as exposed in late April 2015, requiring specialist intervention, yet conservative dressing continued. An out-of-hours GP provided minimal intervention; the regular GP documented inadequate notes and made no wound swabs or hospital referrals despite clear deterioration. A 'wound care specialist' consulted in May was not a registered nurse and her involvement was poorly documented. The patient was admitted to hospital only in June 2015 with advanced sepsis from pseudomonas infection in the leg ulcers; she died three days later. The coroner found inadequate wound assessment and documentation by nursing staff, failure of the visiting GP to escalate care or refer appropriately, insufficient communication with family, and lack of due diligence in credentialing external consultants.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Inadequate wound assessment and documentation by aged care nursing staff
  • Failure to escalate wounds to hospital despite signs of deterioration with exposed tendons
  • Inadequate GP review and follow-up; poor documentation of GP assessments
  • Lack of wound swabs or microbiological investigation despite clinical deterioration
  • Engagement of unqualified wound care consultant without verification of credentials
  • Inadequate communication with family about severity of wound deterioration
  • Lack of process for credentialing external wound care consultants
  • Reliance on nursing staff to request further GP review rather than proactive follow-up by GP
  • Doctor-nurse power dynamic leading to deference to physician opinion without questioning

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Regis to establish and maintain a register of wound care specialists with appropriate credentials and qualifications
  2. Ensure all external wound consultants are suitably accredited and clinically trained
  3. Implement mandatory wound management training for nursing staff
  4. Require weekly photographic documentation and measurements of chronic wounds in accordance with facility policy
  5. Establish clearer referral pathways for complex wounds not responding to conservative treatment
  6. Ensure nursing staff understand they can refer residents to hospital if concerned about adequacy of GP care
  7. Implement processes to ensure regular and timely communication with family about significant changes in resident health status, particularly regarding wound deterioration
  8. GP attending aged care facilities should have proactive follow-up systems for chronic wounds rather than relying solely on staff to request further review
  9. Document clinical reasoning for treatment decisions in medical notes, particularly when conservative management is chosen for serious wounds
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —