Cardiac tamponade due to haemopericardium due to acute ruptured myocardial infarct due to coronary atherosclerosis treated by recent stents placement/angioplasty with complications
AI-generated summary
A 55-year-old woman with extensive coronary artery disease presented for elective stent placement to her left anterior descending artery. During the procedure, a small diagonal branch vessel was occluded—a recognised complication affecting 1–5% of cases. The interventional cardiologist did not document this complication or provide clear clinical direction for post-procedure management. The patient was discharged the next morning without appropriate cardiac enzyme testing or extended observation despite having chest pain and ECG changes following the procedure. She died at home 16 hours later from cardiac rupture and tamponade. The coroner found the patient was discharged too soon; had she remained hospitalised, the rupture likely would have been detected clinically and may have been amenable to emergency surgical repair. Key failures included failure to document the procedural complication, absence of enzyme monitoring despite post-procedure symptoms, and inadequate handover of critical clinical information.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Occlusion of small diagonal branch vessel during percutaneous coronary intervention
Failure to document procedural complication in medical record
Absence of clear clinical handover regarding procedural complications
Failure to order cardiac enzyme testing despite post-procedure chest pain and ECG changes
Early discharge without appropriate period of monitoring post-complication
Lack of serial cardiac enzyme monitoring
Inadequate documentation in operation report
Absence of documented discussion regarding dissection of stented artery
Coroner's recommendations
Coronary Clinical Pathways amended to ensure CK and Troponin testing the morning following the procedure if the patient has prolonged chest pain post-procedure requiring intravenous narcotics
Implementation of Chest Pain Management procedure for CCU and Ward 3E to ensure accurate assessment and prompt management of myocardial ischaemia and monitoring
Implementation of Coronary Angioplasty – Care of Patient CCU procedure requiring prior to discharge: review by medical officer, 12-lead ECG, CK testing at 06:00 the next morning for patients with prolonged chest pain requiring IV narcotics, with results reviewed by interventional fellow or registrar
Implementation of Cardiac Catheter Preparation procedure for standardised care pre and post-operatively
Implementation of Nursing Handover procedure promoting interactive and accurate transfer of patient information shift to shift with bedside handover
Implementation of Documentation in CCU procedure requiring detailed and accurate documentation of acute cardiac events and routine observations
Implementation of Admission of Patient to CCU procedure ensuring effective preparation and assessment
Director of Cardiology to speak to all Consultants regarding need for improved handover and documentation of complications with clear treatment plan
Implementation of 5pm formal handover meeting for Registrars in the CCU for consistent and thorough medical handover
Electronic medical records (iEMR) now manage medical records with automatic transfer of date and time-stamped ECG results
Development of new patient brochures with specific information for radial approach coronary procedures
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.