Coronial
QLDother

Cole, Cameron Brandt

Deceased

Cameron Brandt Cole

Demographics

24y, male

Date of death

2009-08-14

Finding date

2015-09-11

Cause of death

Multiple injuries including fractured left ribs leading to punctured and collapsed left lung with large left haemothorax; severe blunt force/crush trauma

AI-generated summary

Cameron Cole, aged 24, was killed when a heavy steel pipe rack fell from a flatbed trailer during unloading at a remote gas well site. The load of five pipe racks had been inadequately restrained with chains and binders, lacking physical stanchions on one side of the trailer. Critical safety failures included: absence of a pre-task safety briefing ('take 5') before unloading; poor integration of the transport division into site safety systems; truck driver unfamiliar with rig move safety documentation; and lack of exclusion zones during unloading. The coroner found the vehicle design inadequate for the load configuration and the 2009 safety management system had significant gaps in managing rig move risks. Emergency response was appropriate given remote location. Lessons: integrate transport workers into safety culture; implement hard physical barriers for load restraint; conduct mandatory pre-task briefings for all unloading operations; establish clear exclusion zones; ensure comprehensive safety documentation applies to all workers regardless of speciality.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Inadequate vehicle design - trailer lacked stanchions on driver's side
  • Improper load configuration - five pipe racks stacked with only chains and binders for restraint
  • No pre-task safety briefing before unloading
  • Absence of exclusion zones during unloading operations
  • Truck driver not integrated into site safety systems or toolbox meetings
  • Truck driver unfamiliar with rig move risk assessments and safe work instructions
  • Poor communication of responsibilities between transport division and rig crew
  • Inadequate supervision and clarity regarding who was in charge of loading/unloading
  • Safety management system focused on drilling operations rather than rig moves
  • Misleading categorisation of equipment transfers as low-risk 'snot loads'

Coroner's recommendations

  1. That Santos, together with the CSG Industry Leadership Group and the Australian Road Transport Suppliers Association consider the implementation of suitable additional hard barriers to prevent rig equipment from shifting during loading, haulage and unloading, and that provision for such barriers be incorporated into rig move plans and associated risk management documents.
  2. That these findings be referred to the National Transport Commission for consideration in the current revision of the National Load Restraint Guide, including whether: (a) that Guide should place more emphasis on specific practices and procedures for the safe unloading of vehicles; (b) provisions for the direct restraint of loads through measures such as posts or stanchions should be mandatory; and (c) Loading and Unloading Exclusion Zones (LUEZ) industry guidelines should be incorporated in the Guide.
  3. That the Queensland Government consider whether the National Load Restraint Guide applies to the operation of vehicles on land that is not a public place and, if not, take steps to ensure that its application is extended under relevant chain of responsibility legislation, including the Heavy Vehicle National Law (Queensland).
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —