Coronial
QLDhome

Crane, Sylvia - Non-inquest findings

Deceased

Sylvia Crane

Demographics

66y, female

Coroner

Lock

Date of death

2012-10-04

Finding date

2014-08-11

Cause of death

Pulmonary thromboembolism due to renal vein thrombus secondary to renal cell carcinoma of right kidney

AI-generated summary

Sylvia Crane, 66, died from pulmonary thromboembolism caused by tumour thrombus originating from renal cell carcinoma. She had a five-month delay in scheduling Category 1 surgery for nephrectomy due to systemic waitlist management failures at RBWH. Although the rapid disease progression was exceptionally rare, earlier surgical intervention may have prevented death by removing the kidney before tumour spread to the inferior vena cava. Communication failures occurred when Hervey Bay Hospital contacted RBWH urology about her September admission with worsening symptoms—documentation was absent from RBWH records, and the treating surgeon was unaware of her presentation. The case highlights critical system deficiencies: patients waited up to 88 days from outpatient assessment to theatre despite Category 1 urgency; there were no established referral pathways for regional patients; and inadequate information transfer between hospitals. RBWH has since implemented significant improvements including waitlist streaming, daily case discussions, and prioritisation processes. Clinicians should ensure symptom changes in pre-operative patients are escalated and documented, and that referrals from regional centres are actively managed.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

urologygeneral practiceemergency medicinepathology

Error types

communicationsystemdelay

Clinical conditions

renal cell carcinomapulmonary thromboembolismrenal vein thrombustumour thrombushaematuriaflank pain

Procedures

laparoscopic right nephrectomy

Contributing factors

  • five month delay in scheduling Category 1 surgery for nephrectomy
  • systemic waitlist management failures at RBWH Department of Urology
  • communication failure between Hervey Bay Hospital and RBWH urology team regarding patient presentation and symptoms in September 2012
  • absence of documentation in RBWH records of contact from Hervey Bay Hospital about patient's admission
  • treating surgeon at RBWH unaware of patient's hospital admission and changing symptoms
  • rapid and rare progression of renal tumour with invasion into inferior vena cava
  • no established referral pathways for regional patients to appropriate local hospitals
  • theatre lists fully booked with competing waitlist management pressures for multiple patient categories

Coroner's recommendations

  1. RBWH Surgical & Perioperative Services should consider reviewing the access criteria for the Department of Urology in relation to less acute referrals to enable more timely management of urgent and complex cases
  2. Continue implementation of improved waitlist management processes including daily case discussions, prioritisation according to clinical need, and use of waitlist streaming strategies
  3. Maintain current processes ensuring Category 1 patients are booked for surgery on the day they are considered ready for care
  4. Review pathways for referrals from regional hospitals to ensure patients are referred to appropriate local services where capabilities exist
  5. Ensure adequate communication and documentation of inter-hospital contacts regarding patient clinical changes and admissions
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.