Coronial
QLDother

S

Deceased

S

Demographics

10y, female

Date of death

2009-02-07

Finding date

2012-05-22

Cause of death

injuries sustained from being struck by a car

AI-generated summary

A 10-year-old girl in state child protection care died after being struck by a car while missing from a residential care facility. She had been placed at Lifestyle Solutions despite being outside the facility's service agreement, following exhaustion of foster care options. The placement proceeded without adequate risk assessment, particularly regarding her known absconding behaviour. Significant conflict with another resident, including documented physical assaults, was not adequately communicated between departmental teams or to staff. When the child and another resident went missing during a crisis involving the aggressive resident, the police search was poorly coordinated, hampered by lack of incident command training, unclear procedures for medium-risk missing persons, and poor communication between the duty officer and communications centre. Multiple systemic failures in inter-agency communication, placement decision-making, incident reporting, and operational police procedures contributed to the fatal outcome.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • placement outside service agreement without adequate safeguards
  • insufficient risk assessment of absconding behaviour
  • inadequate communication between departments regarding child conflict
  • failure to communicate incident reports to Department
  • incomplete assessment and admission paperwork at residential facility
  • poor internal communication systems at care facility
  • insufficient staff training and orientation at residential facility
  • inadequate monitoring of residential facility by Department
  • poor coordination of police search operation
  • inadequate risk assessment by police
  • failure to escalate to Search and Rescue procedures
  • lack of incident command training for acting duty officer
  • poor communication between duty officer and communications centre
  • insufficient broadcast of missing person alert
  • delay in notification that children were missing
  • focus on crisis with aggressive resident rather than locating missing children

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Department review processes for placing children outside service agreements and develop management plans with close monitoring before placement
  2. Department develop ICMS field recording past conflict/relationship issues between children for accessibility by CSOs and PSUs
  3. Department review and implement formal carer feedback mechanism following placements
  4. Department review reporting requirements by carers and facilities and streamline processes; conduct regular audits of care facility policies, procedures, communications and staff training
  5. Department ensure supervision review of kinship care investigations and timeframes
  6. Lifestyle Solutions ensure monitoring and internal review processes for policies, procedures, communications and staff training across all centres
  7. QPS ensure all acting DDOs complete Incident Command Training or at least SAP preparatory module
  8. QPS revise OPM sections 12.5 and 17.5 and map Rockhampton SOP to clarify medium risk incident management and escalation
  9. QPS consider facility to permit 000 call monitoring and involvement of persons other than call taker
  10. QPS revise communication procedures between DDO and Comco to ensure status awareness and consultation before reallocation of resources
  11. QPS increase frequency of BOLF broadcasts for vulnerable missing persons
  12. Department develop audit tool for examining start-up organisation policies, procedures and compliance in initial phases of residential facility operation
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —