Mia Davies died from peripartum hypoxia after a prolonged and poorly managed labour at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital. She had been diagnosed with multiple congenital anomalies (atrioventricular septal defect, oesophageal and duodenal atresia) and demonstrated an abnormal CTG trace with reduced variability for several days before labour. Critical clinical failures included: failure to recognize that labour guidelines should apply despite fetal anomalies; inadequate handover communication of the management plan; absence of fetal blood sampling despite prolonged abnormal CTG; multiple consultant involvement without clear leadership; and delayed delivery. The coroner found numerous opportunities existed where different clinical action could have altered the outcome. Key preventable factors were lack of clear documentation of management plans, failure to perform fetal blood sampling when indicated, and suboptimal consultant review and supervision of this complex, high-risk case.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Abnormal CTG trace with reduced variability not acted upon despite clear clinical indications
Failure to perform fetal blood sampling despite prolonged abnormal CTG
Inadequate and broken handover communication of management plan
Absence of clear documented management plan in medical records
Multiple consultant involvement without clear clinical leadership
Failure to recognize that standard labour management guidelines should apply despite fetal congenital anomalies
Suboptimal consultant review and supervision of high-risk labour
Excessive labour stimulation with syntocinon causing hyperstimulation
Delay of almost 90 minutes from decision to instrumental delivery to actual birth
Subgaleal haemorrhage from obstructed labour and instrumentation
Underlying congenital cardiac abnormality may have reduced tolerance to labour stress
Coroner's recommendations
The Hospital should adopt a policy, procedure or practice that at the changeover of shifts between consultants (at 0815 and 1630) a consultant personally review all high risk patients to satisfy themselves of the ongoing management plan and that management is appropriate
A management plan should be documented in the Statewide Pregnancy Health Record from the outset, with any changes to the plan documented in the record
The Hospital should conduct an audit to ensure that clinicians reviewing CTG traces document their interpretation on the trace itself and in the medical records and note the actions to be taken
The Hospital should implement the suggestions made at the Mortality and Morbidity Meeting regarding fetal surveillance education, consultant support, clinical handover procedures, and graded assertiveness training
All consultants, registrars and midwives should provide evidence in performance reviews of attendance at RANZCOG training and completion of online RANZCOG modules and K2 program
Consultant support should be provided to reduce clinical risks within the obstetric environment
Multidisciplinary clinical handovers should occur at 0815 and 1630 with mandatory attendance by incoming and outgoing registrars and covering consultants, and midwifery team leader present to relay midwifery issues
Clinical staff should have access to HEAPS training on graded assertiveness and be empowered to escalate concerns to consultants when unsure or unhappy with current management plans
Maternal Fetal Medicine specialists should always attend the 0815 handover
Maternal Fetal Medicine management plans should be documented clearly in the hand-held pregnancy record with explicit statements that babies with anomalies should be managed according to standard delivery protocols
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.