Crooks, Phyllis Anne
Deceased
Phyllis Anne Crooks
Demographics
50y, female
Date of death
2009-12-13
Finding date
2011-06-22
Cause of death
Multiple severe injuries resulting from a motor vehicle collision
AI-generated summary
Phyllis Anne Crooks, a 50-year-old bakery worker, was killed in a head-on collision on the Bruce Highway when a stolen vehicle driven by an intoxicated driver (blood alcohol 0.22%) collided with her car. Police officers were conducting a brief attempted intercept of the stolen vehicle after it performed a dangerous u-turn and drove onto the northbound lanes of the divided highway. One officer initiated a pursuit believing the dangerous driving posed an imminent threat to life. The coroner found the officers complied with Queensland Police Service pursuit policy—the pursuit was of short duration and distance, conducted on a well-maintained road with minimal traffic in good visibility conditions. The death resulted primarily from the criminal recklessness of the drunk driver, not from police conduct. The coroner commended the investigating authorities and noted improvements needed in the QPS pursuit policy to clarify ambiguous language regarding category 1 pursuits.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- criminally dangerous drunken driving by Robert Derks at blood alcohol concentration of 0.219%
- Derks driving a stolen vehicle at excessive speed (153 km/h) on the wrong side of a divided highway
- police attempted intercept precipitated dangerous driving
- Derks impaired judgment due to alcohol consumption
Coroner's recommendations
- QPS pursuit policy has been significantly revised and re-written since this incident; the coroner assumes ambiguities in the pursuit category 1 definition regarding threat to life have been addressed
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —