Extensive crush injury sustained when struck by a heavy vehicle (road train)
AI-generated summary
A 59-year-old woman was struck and killed by a road train while attempting to cross the Stuart Highway at night near Stuarts Well. She was highly intoxicated (BAC 0.15%) and had documented poor vision and hearing. The roadhouse from which she purchased alcohol had breached its liquor licence conditions by serving alcohol without the required meal purchase. The crash was mechanically unavoidable given reaction distances, but was preventable through better alcohol service compliance and pedestrian safety measures. The coroner identified systemic issues including inadequate liquor licence oversight, absence of Licencing NT from road safety governance, and poor coordination of the Pedestrian Safety Reference Group.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Breach of liquor licence conditions by Stuarts Well Roadhouse - serving alcohol without required meal
Dark clothing making pedestrian less visible
Road train headlights dipped due to oncoming traffic (only 25.42m visibility)
Coroner's recommendations
The Department of Logistics and Infrastructure should instruct the Road Safety Task Force and Implementation Project Team to investigate this death, with additional representation from Licencing NT, to identify contributing factors including the liquor licencing breach and determine ways of improving road safety, such as advocating for proactive reviews of CCTV by licence inspectors and/or recommending increased penalties for breaches
The Department of Logistics and Infrastructure should amend the membership structure of the Road Safety Task Force to include representation from Licencing NT
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —