Inquest into the death of Raylene Dick, David Hardy and Karen Bading
Deceased
Karen Bading
Demographics
46y, female
Date of death
2022-01-14
Finding date
2025-08-29
Cause of death
Hepatic encephalopathy due to decompensated Child-Pugh C cirrhosis and meningitis in the context of COVID-19 infection and an unclassified autoimmune disease
AI-generated summary
This combined coronial finding examines three deaths at the Centre for National Resilience (CNR), a COVID-19 quarantine facility in Howard Springs. Ms Dick died from rapidly progressive melioidosis. David Hardy died from respiratory failure related to COPD. Karen Bading, a 46-year-old Aboriginal woman with serious chronic conditions (cirrhosis, lupus, asthma), died from hepatic encephalopathy complicating COVID-19, representing the most significant clinical lessons. Despite alarming vital signs on CNR arrival (BP 80/49) and clear deterioration, she was not properly risk-assessed and hospital transfer was delayed until day 3 when critically unwell. The CDC assumed CNR performed screening; CNR assumed CDC had done so – neither did. Key lessons: clarify pre-quarantine assessment responsibility, implement robust intake assessments with vital sign flags, establish escalation protocols for vulnerable residents, ensure accessible clinical documentation, facilitate family communication for dependent patients, and develop systemic pandemic response solutions.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
infectious diseasesintensive caregeneral medicineemergency medicinepublic health
Failure to conduct meaningful clinical risk assessment on admission to CNR
Failure to identify and act on abnormal vital signs (hypotension 80/49) at intake
Assumption that CDC had conducted clinical risk assessment when they had not
Assumption that CNR would conduct clinical risk assessment when they did not
Case management team included non-clinically trained staff making placement decisions
Inadequate intake assessment processes at CNR
Reliance on telephone checks rather than in-person assessment
Lack of clear allocation of responsibility for risk assessment between CDC and CNR
Recent significant hospitalization (October-November 2021) not adequately considered in placement decision
Family concerns and observations not acted upon promptly
Delay in escalation and transfer to RDH despite clinical deterioration
Coroner's recommendations
Review policies to ensure detailed assessment of a person's reliance on third parties before determining suitability for quarantine in facilities assuming independent living
Review policies to ensure carers approved to isolate with infected persons are recorded in travel documentation
Establish appropriate health screening process for quarantine with clear allocation of responsibility, ideally occurring before arrival at facility
Ensure health screening triages individuals by risk and elevated-risk cases are reviewed by medical officer before transfer recommendation
Ensure health screening staff ask whether person has had recent hospitalization
Develop pro forma records identifying relevant medical details for at-risk residents
Develop individualized care plans for higher-risk residents including in-person medical review shortly after admission and specifying frequency of in-person reviews
Ensure quarantine facility staff have access to screening records
Provide Between the Flags observation forms to visually indicate abnormal observations to inexperienced clinicians
Provide electronic devices (tablets) rather than paper forms for recording observations
Develop system to facilitate communication between vulnerable residents' families and facility welfare officers including liaison officer position
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.