Coronial
NTcommunity

Inquest into the death of Sabrina Di Lembo

Deceased

Sabrina Josephine Di Lembo

Demographics

19y, female

Date of death

2017-08-07

Finding date

2018-12-03

Cause of death

self-inflicted hanging

AI-generated summary

Sabrina Di Lembo, a 19-year-old law student, died by suicide after experiencing anxiety and panic attacks during exam preparation. Over nine weeks, she had 17 medical contacts but received inadequate assessment, no detailed history-taking, and no formal diagnostic tools. Dr B. prescribed sub-therapeutic Efexor 37.5mg (minimum recommended dose 75mg), leading to deterioration attributed to the medication. When Sabrina stopped the drug, neither GP escalated to psychiatry or the Mental Health Service despite their involvement. The Mental Health Service referred her to a GP without face-to-face assessment, then closed her file without coordination with other providers. Key failures included: no specialist referral despite clear indication, poor note-taking, lack of care coordination, and failure to recognize that sub-therapeutic dosing prevented therapeutic benefit. The coroner found multiple missed opportunities where proper assessment and escalation could have altered the outcome.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

general practicepsychiatrypsychology

Error types

diagnosticmedicationcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

venlafaxinediazepammirtazapinerestavit

Clinical conditions

anxiety disordermelancholic depressionpanic attackssuicidal ideation

Contributing factors

  • inadequate mental health assessment by both General Practitioners and Mental Health Service
  • failure to take detailed history
  • prescription of sub-therapeutic dose of venlafaxine (37.5mg vs minimum 75mg)
  • failure to use formal assessment tools (K10, DASS, GAD7)
  • lack of specialist psychiatric referral
  • poor coordination of care between multiple providers
  • Mental Health Service referral to GP without face-to-face assessment
  • closure of Mental Health Service file without consultation with other providers
  • patient deterioration attributed to medication rather than suboptimal dosing
  • failure to escalate when patient stopped antidepressant and experienced suicidal ideation
  • inadequate note-taking preventing care continuity
  • lack of communication between psychiatrist and family despite repeated contact attempts
  • General Practitioners not consulting Mental Health Service when recommending medication cessation

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Top End Mental Health Service must ensure all clients are properly assessed before deciding to refer care to General Practitioners
  2. The role of Top End Mental Health Service in care and treatment must be explicitly stated to client and family
  3. Top End Mental Health Service must have specific procedure for proper coordination with all relevant providers when retaining any responsibility
  4. Before ceasing involvement, Top End Mental Health Service must contact all other relevant providers and obtain copies of their last consultations
  5. Medical Board must remind General Practitioners of care and attention required and obligation to take detailed history, undertake appropriate assessment, and take proper notes when dealing with mental health presentations
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.