Roy Melbourne, aged 81, died by self-inflicted hanging from a ceiling fan in his cell at Darwin Correctional Precinct on 19 November 2015. Melbourne was a long-term prisoner (serving 19+ years of a life sentence for murder) who had been well-behaved and low-risk. He had achieved 'open' security classification allowing community engagement but lost this status days before his death due to a new government policy denying open classification to all prisoners convicted of murder or sexual offences. This occurred after he cancelled his approved parole due to his brother's leukaemia diagnosis and anxiety about parole conditions. The coroner found the facility had classic hanging points (ceiling fans) with no mitigation mechanisms—a known suicide risk—despite being a modern 21st-century facility. The coroner emphasised that restricting reintegration activities for long-term prisoners increases risk and reduces community safety, and criticised the failure to install load-limiting mechanisms on fans despite decades of work since the Aboriginal Deaths in Custody Royal Commission to eliminate such hazards.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
institutional dependence after 19+ years imprisonment
anxiety about parole conditions including mandatory AA meetings and random breath testing
lack of systemic reintegration and resocialisation opportunities for murderers and sexual offenders
Coroner's recommendations
Commissioner of Northern Territory Correctional Services should ensure risk posed by fans in Darwin Correctional Precinct being used as hanging points are mitigated by fitting a load-sensing mechanism or other similar device
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —