Coronial
NTother

Inquest into the death of Styles Isaac King

Deceased

Styles Isaac King

Demographics

30y, male

Date of death

2013-03-27

Finding date

2016-03-18

Cause of death

traumatic asphyxiation

AI-generated summary

Styles Isaac King, an Aboriginal man aged 30, died from traumatic asphyxiation following restraint by crowd controllers at a bar in Katherine, Northern Territory. During an altercation, he was held face-down on the floor in a headlock by Mr Hoermann (197cm, 110.5kg) with Mr Clark applying additional weight via his knees for over 7 minutes. The deceased called out he could not breathe, but restraint continued. King was unresponsive when released, and despite resuscitation attempts, was pronounced dead at hospital. The coroner found inadequate training on positional asphyxia risks among crowd controllers—only 'threadbare' references existed in training materials, with no formal assessment. Both men lacked knowledge of positional asphyxia risks, headlock dangers, and the lethal consequences of prolonged prone restraint. The coroner emphasized improved training and clear safety guidelines were essential to prevent similar deaths, particularly given contributing factors of obesity, alcohol intoxication, and use of prohibited restraint techniques.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicineparamedicineoccupational and environmental health

Error types

proceduralsystemdelay

Drugs involved

alcoholcannabis

Clinical conditions

positional asphyxiationacute asphyxiaacute alcohol toxicitycardiac asystoleconjunctival haemorrhagepulmonary edemaacute heart failure

Procedures

physical restraintheadlockprone positioningcardiopulmonary resuscitation

Contributing factors

  • prone restraint position maintained for over 7 minutes
  • headlock applied by crowd controller
  • weight of two large men pressing on deceased's torso and neck
  • acute alcohol intoxication (BAC 0.210%)
  • obesity (beer belly) restricting diaphragm movement
  • inadequate training on positional asphyxia risks
  • failure to release restraint despite deceased calling out inability to breathe
  • use of prohibited restraint techniques contrary to training

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Improve and clarify training on positional asphyxia risks in crowd controller certification courses—curriculum currently inadequate and should be more directed and assessed
  2. Licensing authority should work with registered training organisations and industry to explicitly embed knowledge and skill requirements addressing positional asphyxia in security operations units of competency
  3. Implement mandatory refresher training for current crowd controller licensees on safe restraint techniques, communication, negotiation, and application of force prior to licence renewal
  4. Katherine Hotel to include specific language in its Code of Conduct warning against holding persons face-down by force and clearly stating the risk of death; align with Director-General of Licensing Practice Direction on asphyxia risks
  5. Minister for Business to conduct review of NT competency standards and training requirements for crowd controllers, considering introduction of refresher training in cross-cultural communication, negotiation, and safe application of force
  6. Align NT security licensing requirements with national standards being developed following ASQA review recommendations, ensuring single set of competency standards across jurisdictions
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.