Coronial
NTother

Inquest into the death of Peter Fittock

Deceased

Peter Andrew Fittock

Demographics

61y, male

Date of death

2014-02-22

Finding date

2016-06-29

Cause of death

self-inflicted hanging

AI-generated summary

Peter Andrew Fittock, a 61-year-old prisoner in low-security housing at Darwin Correctional Centre, died by self-inflicted hanging. He had been incarcerated for 16 years following conviction for murder. Despite a conviction for serious crimes, he had become a well-regarded prisoner running animal breeding and rescue programs and working toward a veterinary nursing qualification. The coroner found his chronic conditions (atrial fibrillation, sleep apnoea) were well-managed, with recent INR levels appropriate. Evidence suggests he was stressed about the possible closure of the animal program due to new prison lease restrictions. The coroner found the Department of Corrections' care, supervision, and treatment were appropriate and did not contribute to his death. No undiagnosed mental illness was identified. His decision appears to have resulted from pragmatic despair over losing his meaningful work rather than any clinical negligence or inadequate custodial care.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Drugs involved

Contributing factors

  • stress related to threatened closure of animal breeding and rescue program
  • pragmatism and acceptance of loss of meaningful work and purpose
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —