A 13-month-old girl with short bowel syndrome died from cardiac arrest due to severe dehydration. She had been deteriorating with diarrhoea and vomiting on 18 February 2009, prompting nursing staff to escalate concerns to the evening registrar. The registrar conducted a brief, superficial examination without reviewing weight loss (8% in 48 hours), checking fluid balance charts, or obtaining relevant medical history. A minimal rehydration plan was implemented but not properly communicated at the shift handover. The night team was unaware of the deteriorating patient. Clinical lessons include: thorough assessment of dehydration requires reviewing weights and charts, especially in short bowel syndrome; adequate handover communication is essential; documentation of clinical assessments is critical for continuity; and prompt recognition of fluid losses demands appropriate escalation and IV rehydration consideration.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
paediatricsemergency medicine
Error types
diagnosticcommunicationsystem
Drugs involved
oral rehydration solution
Clinical conditions
short bowel syndromedehydrationgastroenteritiscardiac arresthypovolaemic shockelectrolyte disturbance
Contributing factors
failure to recognise and adequately assess severity of dehydration
superficial clinical examination without review of weight loss or fluid balance charts
inadequate knowledge of patient's significant medical history (short bowel syndrome)
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.