Coronial
NThospital

Inquest into the death of Declan McConville

Deceased

Declan Brian McConville

Demographics

0y, male

Date of death

2007-09-08

Finding date

2009-05-28

Cause of death

acute hypoxic damage caused by shoulder dystocia during delivery

AI-generated summary

Declan Brian McConville was born with shoulder dystocia (impacted shoulders) after vacuum-assisted delivery at Royal Darwin Hospital on 31 August 2007. He was stuck in the birth canal for approximately 15 minutes before delivery, causing severe hypoxic brain injury. He died 8 days later from acute hypoxic damage and multiple organ failure. The coroner found the vacuum extraction should have been performed in the operating theatre rather than the birthing suite, allowing easier conversion to caesarean section if needed. Antenatal recognition of the baby's large size (estimated 4.5 kg) through ultrasound could have influenced labour management decisions. The consultant obstetrician was not involved in the decision to proceed with the difficult rotational vacuum delivery despite indicators of complexity. While not critical of individual clinicians' actions, the coroner identified systemic issues: lack of routine theatre access for complicated deliveries, inadequate quality assurance processes, and absence of formal credentialing for registrars. The coroner strongly recommended trials of instrumental delivery be conducted in theatre with mandatory consultant involvement.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

obstetricspaediatricsmidwiferyneonatology

Error types

proceduralsystemcommunication

Drugs involved

oxytocinepidural analgesia

Clinical conditions

shoulder dystociahypoxic ischaemic encephalopathyacute hypoxic brain injuryrenal failurecardiac damagefoetal distressmacrosomia

Procedures

vacuum extractionrotational ventouse deliveryepisiotomyartificial rupture of membranesepidural insertionneonatal resuscitationmechanical ventilation

Contributing factors

  • shoulder dystocia during delivery lasting approximately 15 minutes
  • rotational vacuum extraction performed in birthing suite rather than operating theatre
  • consultant obstetrician not involved in decision to proceed with difficult instrumental delivery
  • lack of early recognition of delivery difficulty and decision to abandon attempt
  • large baby (estimated 4.5 kg) not prenatally quantified by ultrasound
  • registrar working without senior consultant present despite indicators of complex delivery
  • high head station (0) and right occipital posterior position requiring 180-degree rotation
  • systemic barriers to theatre access for complicated instrumental deliveries

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Royal Darwin Hospital should ensure all trials of instrumental deliveries occur in theatre with mandatory consultant involvement and clear guidelines to this effect
  2. Urgent attention should be given to removing barriers that prevent theatre access for complicated instrumental deliveries
  3. Royal Darwin Hospital should institute improved quality and safety procedures including: senior support and allocated time for reviews; reviews conducted soon after events; multidisciplinary involvement of all staff involved; non-threatening atmosphere; recorded outcomes; and external assistance for serious matters
  4. When a foetus is thought to be clinically large with fundal height above the mean in post-dates women, consideration should be given to performing an ultrasound to estimate foetal weight as a guide to actual size
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.