David William Mather, a 67-year-old homeless man, was admitted to Royal Darwin Hospital on 29 September 2003 with a displaced compound fracture of the left humerus. He left the ward on 4 October 2003 in hospital pyjamas, leaving behind his arm brace, clothes, and approximately $900 in cash held in security. Hospital staff followed the Absconding Patients Policy, determining that police notification was not required. The deceased was discharged in absentia. Nine months later, skeletal remains found near the hospital helipad were identified as the deceased. The cause of death could not be determined but likely resulted from exposure and dehydration. The Coroner found staff acted appropriately under existing policy but recommended that future decisions regarding missing patients incorporate fuller information about circumstances of departure (items left behind, clothing worn, personal effects) and that follow-up procedures be established for patients who leave in concerning circumstances.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
orthopaedic surgeryemergency medicine
Error types
communicationsystem
Clinical conditions
displaced compound fracture of left humerushomelessnesscognitive impairment from chronic alcohol usehistory of bilateral humeral fractures from prior assault
Contributing factors
homelessness and lack of fixed abode
absconding from hospital without formal discharge
incomplete information available to decision-maker regarding patient circumstances
policy did not require notification to police for patient in deceased's circumstances
decision-maker unaware of items left behind in security and cash
decision-maker unaware patient had left in pyjamas only
Coroner's recommendations
RDH should consider changes to the Absconding Patients Policy so that decisions not to report a missing patient to police are made with as much information about the patient as possible
Before deciding not to report a missing patient to police, staff should check what items the patient left behind (clothing, personal effects, money held in security, medical aids such as arm braces) and what state they left in (pyjamas only vs. dressed)
The policy should include provision for follow-up checks within one or two days for patients who leave in circumstances suggestive of intent to return (e.g., left in pyjamas, left personal effects, left money)
The policy should be expanded to include patients subject to Adult Guardianship orders
The hospital should clarify responsibility for follow-up when police are contacted regarding a missing patient
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.