secondary haemorrhage following gastric banding surgery
AI-generated summary
A 41-year-old enrolled nurse died from secondary haemorrhage eight days after laparoscopic gastric banding surgery in Darwin. She attended ED on 18 February with post-operative pain; Dr McNair discharged her after two hours without contacting her surgeon. She consulted another doctor on 20 February with wound infection but cancelled her surgical appointment. She died 21 February from massive intra-abdominal bleeding from infected necrotic tissue at the band site. The coroner found the surgery was competently performed with no technical fault. The necrosis and subsequent bleeding were not detectable earlier and resulted from normal surgical risks. Key clinical lesson: establish clear protocols requiring routine notification of operating surgeons when post-operative patients attend ED, even when initial assessment seems reassuring. The coroner noted the discharge protocol was ambiguous and inadequate.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
general surgeryemergency medicinegeneral practicepathology
laparoscopic gastric bandingswedish adjustable gastric band placement
Contributing factors
failure of ED to contact operating surgeon Dr T. when post-operative patient attended with pain
ambiguous and inadequate protocol for notifying treating surgeons in ED
necrotic tissue at gastric band site due to normal surgical trauma
patient cancelled surgeon appointment on 20 February
undetected wound infection
Coroner's recommendations
Rectify ambiguity in Royal Darwin Hospital ED protocol regarding contact of treating surgeons of post-operative patients
Implement routine notification (rather than routine contact) of treating surgeons whenever operative patients attend ED, even when no other action warranted
Establish consultation process between Director of Emergency Medicine and treating surgeons to develop workable protocol accommodating needs of both parties
Methods of notification could include: provision of discharge summary to surgeon, notification at handover, copying notes to surgeon's rooms, email notification, or pigeon-hole system
Review and enhance induction program for overseas-trained doctors at Royal Darwin Hospital to address differences in medical practice between their country of origin and Australia
Specifically address variation in protocols regarding surgeon notification and other aspects of medical practice that may differ from overseas training
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.