Inquest into the death of Craig Matthews
Deceased
Craig Kenneth Matthews
Demographics
35y, male
Date of death
2001-10-08
Finding date
2004-05-21
Cause of death
gunshot wound to the head
AI-generated summary
Craig Kenneth Matthews, a 35-year-old male on home detention for drug manufacturing offences, was found dead from a gunshot wound to the head on 8 October 2001. He was an illicit drug user with cannabis and amphetamine addiction who continued drug use while under home detention supervision. Despite random checks by surveillance officers, he tested positive for drugs twice during his detention period. The coroner could not determine who fired the fatal weapon, though evidence suggests foul play related to his drug activities. The case highlights challenges in supervising individuals on home detention orders, particularly when drug-related criminal networks are involved. Several witnesses were evasive and obstructive, suggesting knowledge they withheld from the inquiry.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- illicit drug use and addiction
- continued drug manufacture and use while on home detention
- involvement in criminal drug networks
- inadequate supervision/surveillance of home detention order
- evasive witnesses with apparent knowledge of death
- possible drug deal or transaction on night of death
Coroner's recommendations
- Investigation to be continued by Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions
- Follow-up of previously unmentioned suspect with 'ring of truth' to investigation
Full text
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —