Coronial
NTcommunity

Inquest into the death of William Mason

Deceased

William Mason

Demographics

68y, male

Date of death

1998-03-19

Finding date

2001-05-04

Cause of death

unknown

AI-generated summary

William Mason, an elderly man living in a caravan at Humpty Doo, Northern Territory, was last seen on 19 March 1998 and reported missing on 30 March 1998. His skeletal remains were discovered on 29 April 1998 in a shallow grave. The forensic pathologist could not determine cause of death due to advanced decomposition. Evidence indicated Mason had been subjected to harassment and cruelty by young men in the weeks before his disappearance, particularly regarding his cats being killed by their dog. There was hearsay evidence he may have suffered a heart attack during confrontations, but this could not be corroborated. The body appeared to have been moved and possibly burned prior to burial. Despite extensive police investigation and public appeal, the actual cause of death remained undetermined. The coroner made an open finding, unable to establish whether the harassment, suspected criminal interference, or other circumstances contributed to his death.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • harassment and cruel treatment by young men
  • alleged stress or distress related to cat killings
  • possible heart attack (hearsay, unconfirmed)
  • body interference prior to discovery
  • advanced decomposition preventing pathological examination
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —