Undetermined. Coroner stated 'the evidence adduced does not enable me to determine either the manner or cause of her death.' Possibilities that could not be excluded included accidental drowning, foul play, or placement of an already-deceased body in the waterhole.
AI-generated summary
Daneeka Priscilla Nixon, 25, was found deceased in a waterhole on a rural property near Lismore NSW on 20 April 2006, four days after she was last seen alive at an Easter weekend party. Witnesses described her as progressively disoriented, withdrawn, and unsteady on 16 April, consistent with intoxication; cannabis was confirmed by toxicology, while alcohol and LSD (both reportedly consumed) were not detected post-mortem. Post-mortem examination revealed significant decomposition that prevented definitive determination of cause of death. The coroner could not exclude accidental drowning, deliberate placement in water, or foul play. No major trauma was evident except animal predation. The Deputy State Coroner made open findings (manner and cause undetermined) and recommended forwarding evidence to the Homicide Squad's Cold Case Division, assessing diatom testing on retained samples, and negotiating a Charter of Agreement between NSW and Queensland police for shared diving resources at their border.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
NSW Commissioner of Police to negotiate a Charter of Agreement with Queensland Commissioner of Police regarding shared use of police diver resources in areas close to the NSW/Queensland border, similar to existing agreement with Victorian Commissioner
Officer in Charge to forward file of evidence in this matter to the Cold Case Division of the Homicide Squad
Cold Case investigators to assess viability of diatom testing of retained physical samples in consultation with Professor Jacob John, Curtin University, Western Australia
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —