DB, a 28-year-old with first episode psychosis, was admitted to Nepean Hospital on 31 March 2009 after self-harming. He was appropriately diagnosed and treated with olanzapine under the Mental Health Act. Two independent psychiatrists confirmed his clinical care, medication, supervision, and leave decisions were appropriate. However, the coroner identified critical gaps: risk assessments at weekly interdisciplinary meetings were poorly recorded—one completed by a social worker who had never met DB—and the family received inadequate psycho-education about suicide risk and supervision requirements specific to early psychosis. When granted leave on 21 April, DB absconded, purchased rope, and died by ligature strangulation. The coroner recommended developing standardised leave forms and information packages for first episode psychosis patients, emphasising formal family education on diagnosis, treatment, heightened suicide risk, and supervision requirements.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
inadequate psycho-education of family regarding suicide risk in early psychosis
inadequate recording of risk assessments at weekly interdisciplinary meetings
increased leave (4 hours vs prior 3 hours) without enhanced supervision
family not informed that leave does not indicate recovery or absence of self-harm risk
family meeting held in semi-public courtyard, not private setting
Coroner's recommendations
Introduction of a leave form for involuntary patients with first episode psychosis, including diagnosis, treatment, suicide risk disclosure, and supervision requirements
Creation and distribution of an information package for patients and families/carers relating to first episode psychosis
Psychiatric consultant to be the sole person who signs off weekly interdisciplinary meeting risk assessment records
Teaching sessions to educate mental health clinicians on proper completion of risk assessment forms
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —