Christine Crickitt died on 31 December 2009 or 1 January 2010 at Woodbine in unexplained and possibly suspicious circumstances. The coroner conducted a full inquest spanning eight hearing dates but could not determine either the cause or manner of death due to insufficient evidence. The critical finding was that the autopsy procedure was hindered by inadequate collection and storage of biological specimens essential for forensic analysis. Specifically, vitreous humour and blood serum specimens were not properly collected, retained, or stored. The coroner identified a systemic gap: many NSW morgues lacked appropriate equipment and standardised procedures for specimen preservation. The coroner recommended that all morgues throughout New South Wales implement mandatory procedures for collecting and storing these specimens during autopsies of sudden, unexplained deaths, and provide adequate storage facilities including freezers capable of maintaining -20°C temperatures to support rigorous forensic investigation.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
inadequate collection of vitreous humour and blood serum specimens during autopsy
lack of standardised specimen collection procedures
inadequate morgue equipment and storage facilities for biological specimens
Coroner's recommendations
Ensure that collection, storage and retention of vitreous humour and blood serum specimens becomes normal procedure when performing autopsies of sudden, unexplained, possibly suspicious deaths
Provide equipment including freezers capable of -20 degrees to all morgues where autopsies are performed throughout New South Wales
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —