Paul Brauer, 64, died of pulmonary embolus at Leeton District Hospital following a complex admission involving psychiatric depression, atrial fibrillation, urinary retention, and multiple comorbidities. The coroner identified significant system failures: warfarin was recommended by multiple doctors but never seriously considered despite AF and previous stroke; discharge planning on 12 September failed to follow policy with no written care plan or agency coordination; post-discharge monitoring was inadequate, allowing marked deterioration by 26 September; case management was not implemented; escalation occurred too late. Expert evidence was divided on whether anticoagulation would have prevented the PE. The coroner could not establish causation between the documented failures and death because the PE origin remains undetermined. Deep vein thrombosis from immobility was likely. Recommendations include appointing coordinating clinicians for complex patient management and discharge planning at both hospitals.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Appoint an overall person responsible for holistic management of complex patients during admission to Wagga Wagga Base Hospital and Leeton District Hospital
Appoint an overall person responsible for implementation of Leeton District Hospital's discharge planning policies and procedures
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —