Inquest into the death of Roland Ashbolt
Deceased
Roland Ashbolt
Demographics
39y, male
Date of death
2022-06-28
Finding date
2025-06-12
Cause of death
clozapine toxicity
AI-generated summary
Roland Ashbolt, a 39-year-old man remanded in custody with schizophrenia, died from clozapine toxicity. He had been prescribed clozapine (400mg daily) from January 2022 with good clinical response and therapeutic levels. On 28 June 2022, he was found unresponsive in his cell at Long Bay Correctional Centre Mental Health Unit. Post-mortem analysis showed clozapine at 4.6 mg/L (therapeutic range 0.35-0.6 mg/L), indicating one or more overdoses. Expert evidence established the clozapine level was not artifactual despite eight-day post-mortem interval. The prescription of clozapine was clinically appropriate given treatment-resistant schizophrenia and previous positive response. Administration protocols including supervised medication and oral cavity checks were appropriate. Regular cell searches and nursing checks were conducted. No evidence suggested additional preventive measures were strongly indicated. Death was classified as misadventure due to unintentional overdose.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- possible medication stockpiling or hoarding of clozapine
- history of previous overdose attempts
- history of suicidal ideation and self-harm
- ingestion of one or more overdoses of clozapine
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —