Coronial
NSWmental health

Inquest into the death of Roger Frederick Schnelle

Deceased

Roger Frederick Schnelle

Demographics

59y, male

Date of death

2021-04-30

Finding date

2024-05-16

Cause of death

head injuries

AI-generated summary

Roger Schnelle, a 59-year-old accountant, died from head injuries sustained through intentional self-harm while involuntarily detained at Nolan House mental health facility in April 2021. He developed sudden onset severe mental illness (anxiety disorder with depressive features, with possible psychotic depression) triggered by debilitating vestibular symptoms. Despite rapid clinical deterioration from 21-28 April, risk assessment tools recorded him as "moderate" risk throughout. Critical failures included: inadequate escalation of nursing observations despite clear warning signs (threatening self-harm, attempted choking, concerning communications with family); lack of multidisciplinary risk formulation and management documentation; failure to communicate the banana self-harm attempt to treating team; and insufficient consideration of differential diagnosis of psychotic depression. The coroner found the risk assessment process was outdated and inadequate, observing levels should have been increased from 26 April onwards. While the specific method (sliding doors) was unforeseeable, systemic failures in risk communication and management reduced the patient's safety margins during a critical deterioration period.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • psychotic depression (or anxiety disorder with depressive features)
  • inadequate risk assessment and escalation
  • failure to increase observation levels despite clinical deterioration
  • poor communication between nursing and medical staff
  • inadequate multidisciplinary risk management planning
  • failure to escalate concerning information from family member
  • lack of electronic medical records
  • outmoded risk assessment tools (tick-box system)
  • unrecorded informal observation increases by nursing staff

Coroner's recommendations

  1. That consideration be given to continuing to advocate with NSW Health and the Department of Health, Victoria, for the implementation of an electronic medical record across Albury Wodonga Health mental health services. Such a record should ideally be compatible with systems in both NSW and Victoria, and should include standardised documents for the assessment, formulation and management of risk and patient observations.
  2. That consideration be given to a review being undertaken of the Albury Wodonga Health mental health service policy relevant to risk assessment, patient observation and documentation to ensure compatibility with both NSW and Victorian policies. Where those policies are not compatible, draw this to the attention of NSW Health and the Department of Health, Victoria, in accordance with the process described in the AWH Memorandum of Understanding.
  3. That consideration be given to implementing Risk Assessment Tools that focus on assessment, formulation, and importantly management of risk and consider risk indicator factors that are associated with an increased suicide or suicidal behaviour, as set out in the expert evidence of Dr E..
  4. That consideration be given to ensuring that the induction processes for locum and visiting staff members clearly identify relevant policy and practices in relation to the assessment, formulation and management of risk documentation and patient observations.
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —