Coronial
NSWhospital

Inquest into the death of AX

Deceased

AX (pseudonym)

Demographics

45y, female

Coroner

Decision ofDeputy State Coroner Baptie

Date of death

2020-08-05

Finding date

2024-10-11

Cause of death

Multiple blunt force injuries

AI-generated summary

A 45-year-old woman with acute psychotic illness attended Prince of Wales Hospital ED on 4 August 2020 after presenting to police with persecutory delusions. She was assessed by mental health and medical clinicians who appropriately identified probable psychotic illness and arranged investigations. However, when she left the ED unexpectedly around 4pm, critical gaps in clinical management emerged. The mental health Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) who took over failed to review her clinical notes and provided advice that she was a voluntary patient without assessing her risk. No psychiatry registrar was consulted after she left, no referral was made to acute care services, and police were not notified of her departure. She was found in the Queen Victoria Building shortly after and died from injuries sustained falling from a height while acutely psychotic. Earlier psychiatric scheduling when risk became apparent, immediate involvement of senior psychiatry staff, and prompt activation of acute care services and police notifications may have prevented her death.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinepsychiatryneurology

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Clinical conditions

acute psychosispersecutory delusionspsychotic illness

Contributing factors

  • Acute psychotic illness with persecutory delusions
  • Unexpected departure from ED around 4pm
  • Failure to schedule patient under Mental Health Act despite clear indicators
  • Senior mental health clinician failed to review clinical notes
  • Failure to involve psychiatry registrar or consultant after patient left ED
  • No referral made to Acute Care Services on 4 August despite clear indication for psychiatric admission
  • No notification to police of vulnerable patient's departure from ED
  • Poor communication between medical and mental health teams after patient departure
  • Absence of 'unmanaged departure' protocol implementation
  • Delay in activating acute care team referral until next morning

Coroner's recommendations

  1. That as a matter of priority, a review be undertaken by SESLHD executive staff in relation to establishing a clear process and procedure for mental health consumers/patients who attend ED at Prince of Wales Hospital but leave prior to completion of treatment (unmanaged departures), including: clarification of applicable policy for unmanaged departures with operative flowcharts and the Mental Health Clinical Nurse Consultant ED Practice Guide, with consideration of appropriate staff training; and consideration of implementing appropriate clinical audits of Mental Health CNC Referral Board data and notifications on IMS+ regarding unmanaged departure incidents
  2. That as a matter of priority, steps be taken to ensure mental health clinical staff in ED of Prince of Wales Hospital have clear understanding of circumstances in which consumers/patients can be scheduled under Mental Health Act 2007, including constraints on scheduling patients who have not been personally examined
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.