Benjamin Woodhouse, a 59-year-old involuntary mental health patient with schizophrenia and a history of absconding, drowned in the Parramatta River while on escorted leave. Critical systemic failures included inadequate risk assessments by NDIS care providers AFEA and PCCS, failure to communicate Ben's propensity for water entry and suicidal ideation to carers, lack of conditions of leave documentation, and delayed police notification. The escort carer lacked mental health training. The coroner found the death was by misadventure, not suicide. Key preventive lessons: formal risk assessments must occur after significant incidents; written conditions of leave are essential; mental health history must be systematically communicated to carers at service commencement; police should be notified immediately when involuntary patients abscond; and information provided to police should include last-seen location and witness contact details to enable effective search.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Inadequate risk assessment by Primary Care and Community Services
Failure to communicate patient's history of water entry and suicidal ideation to carers
Lack of written conditions of leave
Carer lacked mental health training
Delayed police notification
Insufficient information provided to police for effective search
Deficient care planning by AFEA
No incident reporting system linking to care plan updates
Absence of behavioural support plan
Conditions of leave not documented in writing
Coroner's recommendations
The LHD amend its leave form to be provided to the patient, family and any third-party carer to record the conditions of leave which must be complied with.
Where it is proposed to send an involuntary patient on leave the LHD provide a written summary to both support coordinators and care providers of a patient's history, diagnosis, trigger points, risk, behaviour management techniques and what to do in an emergency, e.g., if the patient absconds.
PCCS review current management of and compliance with its risk policy and procedures in light of this case and conduct risk assessments on intake as well as when significant events occur.
PCCS require a support co-ordinator to contact police and/or ambulance as soon as it is notified that a client who is an involuntary patient absconds from a carer except where such contact with police and/or ambulance has already occurred.
AFEA institute a risk assessment process for each client (who is an involuntary patient) which includes a regular review of such risk assessments including when relevant circumstances change.
AFEA make it plain to its support workers and care co-ordinators that they are expected to contact police and/or ambulance as soon as a client who is an involuntary patient absconds from a carer.
PCCS and AFEA each develop a form based upon the NSW Police 'absconded patient – report to police' form, containing relevant information to provide to the police and any other relevant agency, which sets out full information about the circumstances of the absconding.
The Commissioner of Police consider amending the absconded patient report to police form to include a requirement to specify where the patient was last seen, by whom and the contact details of the person who last saw the patient.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —