Coronial
NSWother

Inquest into the disappearance and suspected death of Alexander Stetz

Deceased

Alexander Stetz

Demographics

72y, male

Date of death

2014-07-14/2014-07-31

Finding date

2023-02-09

Cause of death

Unable to be determined

AI-generated summary

Alexander Stetz, a 72-year-old man with significant dementia, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and prior stroke, disappeared on 14 July 2014 from a remote property in Sackville, NSW while under the care of his long-term carer and friend. He wandered into isolated bushland during a brief period when his carer was focused on work nearby. Despite immediate and extensive search efforts involving police, SES, cadaver dogs, and helicopter rescue within hours, he was never located. No subsequent contact with bank accounts or known associates occurred. The coroner concluded he died, likely from disorientation related to dementia combined with his age, medical frailty, and challenging terrain. While supervision was attentive given circumstances, the remote location and rapid onset of wandering behaviour highlights risks of caring for cognitively impaired elderly patients in isolated settings without institutional support structures.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Dementia causing disorientation and confusion
  • Remote, isolated bushland location
  • Medical frailty (multiple cardiac conditions, prior stroke, mobility limitations)
  • Wandering behaviour in unfamiliar environment
  • Brief period of reduced supervision while carer focused on work
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —