Inquest into the death of Kelvin Forrest
Deceased
Kelvin James Forrest
Demographics
53y, male
Date of death
2018-07-28
Finding date
2022-03-11
Cause of death
multiple injuries sustained in a fall from the first floor
AI-generated summary
Kelvin Forrest, a 53-year-old man with Down syndrome and dementia, died from multiple injuries sustained in a fall from the first floor of Byron Central Hospital on 28 July 2018. He had been admitted as a medical patient awaiting NDIS funding approval for supported independent living. Despite documented frequent wandering behaviour, including an incident where he was found on the road outside the hospital, supervision was inadequate. A veranda door was left unlocked to accommodate another patient's behavioural needs, allowing Kelvin to access the roof where he fell. The coroner found the death preventable, noting that consistent 24-hour specialised supervision from admission would likely have saved his life. Key failings included inadequate risk assessment of wandering behaviour, failure to escalate concerns to senior medical staff, incomplete handover of risk information between shifts, delays in NDIS funding approval, and poor coordination between hospital discharge planning and disability support services.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Contributing factors
- inadequate supervision of patient with wandering behaviour due to dementia
- failure to implement continuous 1:1 specialised nursing supervision despite documented risk
- unlocked veranda door left accessible to accommodate another patient's behavioural needs
- lack of medical review after significant incident (found on road)
- failure to adequately communicate wandering risks at shift handovers
- characterisation of admission as 'social' rather than medical, reducing clinical vigilance
- competing patient needs not systematically managed on ward
- insufficient understanding of home-seeking behaviour in dementia
- delays in NDIS funding approval extending hospital stay
- poor liaison between hospital and disability support services
- limited awareness and use of Health Disability Inclusion Manager role
Coroner's recommendations
- NNSWLHD to implement an admission process whereby explicit consideration is given and recorded as to whether the patient experiences a disability and/or is an NDIS participant, with explicit consideration of barriers to care and necessary service adjustments, including consideration of referral to the Health Disability Inclusion Manager
- NNSWLHD to consider implementation and/or adaptation of the Revised Algase Wandering Scale (RAWS) – Long-Term Care Version for patients presenting with a history of wandering or who engage in wandering whilst admitted
- All staff engaged in casework, Team and Support Coordinator roles and managerial roles at United Disability (ACCnet21) to complete mandatory training in consultation with NDIA representatives on: (a) requirements under NDIS Act regarding approval, review and increasing funding; (b) the 'Determining Need - Identifying Suitable Housing Solutions' guideline; and (c) evidence required for completion of all forms submitted to NDIA including Plan Review Report, Change of Circumstances Form, Review of Reviewable Decision form, and Support Coordination End of Service Report
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —