Inquest into the death of Therese WILLIAMS
Deceased
Therese Williams
Demographics
60y, female
Date of death
2020-08-27
Finding date
2022-02-24
Cause of death
ischaemic heart disease
AI-generated summary
A 60-year-old woman was found deceased at her home, having enjoyed an evening with friends the previous evening. Autopsy revealed focal narrowing (40%) of one major coronary artery with mild left ventricular scarring and chronic liver congestion, indicating previous cardiac damage. While the pathologist initially recorded the cause as unascertained due to the relatively mild coronary narrowing, the coroner, applying the civil standard of balance of probabilities rather than the stricter medical standard, concluded the death was due to ischaemic heart disease. The case highlights the importance of recognizing that significant family history of early coronary disease, unexplained ventricular fibrosis, and chronic cardiac changes can indicate underlying ischaemic disease even when coronary narrowing appears modest on isolated assessment. Earlier recognition of cardiovascular risk factors and preventive investigation may have altered her outcome.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- focal coronary artery narrowing (40%)
- left ventricular scarring indicating previous cardiac event
- chronic liver congestion suggestive of cardiac dysfunction
- family history of early coronary disease
- possible history of hypertension without documented management
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —