Malignant ventricular arrhythmia without myocardial infarction, precipitated by multiple factors including positional asphyxia, exertion and use of taser, superimposed upon Jack's underlying occult coronary heart disease
AI-generated summary
Jack Kokaua, a 30-year-old with schizophrenia and coronary artery disease, died from malignant ventricular arrhythmia during a police encounter after absconding from hospital. Contributing factors included positional asphyxia, exertion, taser use (deployed three times), and his underlying heart disease. Critical failures included: no ambulance called early despite known mental health crisis; inadequate police supervision and communication; failure to monitor breathing during prone restraint; hospital released him prematurely without coordinated mental health follow-up; and parole officer lost contact with him for seven days before death. His prescribed antipsychotic (Zuclopenthixol) dose had been missed, leaving him unmedicated for weeks. Multiple agencies failed coordinated care, and police tactics prioritized control over welfare assessment despite his known vulnerability.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Non-compliance with antipsychotic medication (missed depot injections)
Mental health crisis and psychotic symptoms
Police officers applying weight to torso during extended prone restraint
Failure to monitor breathing or establish supervision during restraint
Inadequate communication between police officers
Failure to call ambulance at earliest opportunity
Hospital discharge without coordinated mental health follow-up
Unstable accommodation and loss of community mental health engagement
Coroner's recommendations
Consideration be given to modifying police and ambulance operating procedures and MOU such that police are required to give active consideration to calling an ambulance at the earliest available opportunity when seeking to arrest or return to detention an individual with a known mental health illness or who has absconded from compulsory mental health detention if it is considered that the use of force may be required or it is considered that the individual is at risk of harming himself or at risk of harming others at the relevant time
Consideration be given to expanding the funding for and roll-out of the PACER program
Consideration be given to developing criteria to determine whether a situation requiring police attendance indicates a person of interest with known or suspected mental health problems (Mental Health Crisis)
Either making the four day accredited MHIT training package mandatory for all police officers; or in the alternative, developing and implementing a system requiring where possible the dispatch and early identification of four day MHIT accredited officers as first responders in cases which meet criteria indicating possible Mental Health Crisis
Initiating training and policy provision for communication and de-escalation after there has been use of force in a situation involving a possible Mental Health Crisis
Consideration be given to developing and implementing a system to ensure any four day MHIT accredited officers attending in cases which meet criteria indicating a possible Mental Health Crisis identify themselves on arrival as having undertaken the four day training
Consideration be given to MHIT further developing and implementing for all NSWPF officers the Guardian v Warrior training currently in the Vulnerable Communities Portfolio
Consideration be given to MHIT and WTPR establishing and documenting a joint review of STOPAR and de-escalation training including after a use of force, and for that training to be integrated in defensive tactics training for situations involving a person of interest with known or suspected mental health problems
Consideration be given to NSW Police Weapons and Tactics Policy and Review developing and implementing training for those tasked with the role of supervisor including through the use of roleplay
Consideration be given to requiring one officer to be designated supervisor in any interaction involving 3 or more police officers and use of or likely use of force, with overall responsibility for coordinating response and ensuring ambulance called at earliest opportunity if interaction involves use of force or likely use of force on a person with known mental health illness or who has absconded from compulsory mental health detention
Officers communicate and verbalise significant events in the arrest and detention of a POI including any mechanical restraints applied or the availability of any vehicles or other resources for use during the interaction
Officers communicate and verbalise reports as to the status and well being of the POI, the extent of their resistance, and the ongoing need for use of force, including to the designated supervisor
In all cases an officer be tasked to maintain a time log as to when a POI is placed in the prone position to ensure awareness of the period for which the POI is so placed, that this is reported to the designated supervisor, and that an attempt be made to reposition the POI to minimise the risk of positional asphyxia after the expiry of a defined time interval
In all cases an officer be tasked to monitor the breathing of any POI placed in the prone position, and to communicate and verbalise reports as to the status of the POI's breathing, including to the designated supervisor
All officers are trained as to these matters
RPA require two or more persons (second being physician, clinical nurse consultant, nurse unit manager or supervising Registered Nurse) to jointly determine and provide signed authority for mechanical restraints to be removed even temporarily as regards mental health patients
The existing patient safety physical restraint order and observation chart be amended to record this
This procedure be expressly required as regards temporary relaxation of one or more hand or leg restraints to allow toileting or for any other purpose
RPA explore potential alternative options as to how toileting can be effected for a patient who is mechanically restrained, including the availability of security to assist or that another option may be to ensure the attendance of at least two members of clinical staff to provide additional protection against the patient removing restraints or absconding
Western Sydney LHD introduce a policy, procedure or clinical pathway on discharge from inpatient mental health unit where follow up is considered appropriate to seek to ensure that a community mental health team is identified as taking over clinical responsibility for the patient even if the patient will need to access temporary accommodation
The Discharge Liaison Officer or clinician under whose care the person was admitted at the inpatient facility is required to check that the patient is accepted for care by that team
Where an assertive team recommendation has been accepted in a community mental health setting, that this is communicated both to any inpatient facility to which the person is admitted, to Corrective Services if the person is subject to a parole order or community supervision, and that steps are taken to ensure that that be communicated to any subsequent community mental health team to which the person is admitted
Handover procedures be implemented which specifically address the continuation of prescribed medication
CSNSW introduce a mechanism or procedure to assess and act upon any risk when a parolee is not contactable for 7 days
Community Corrections and NSW Department of Health liaise to develop a means to seek to ensure that as regards offenders where the risk of reoffending has been identified as being linked to their mental health care, discharges from inpatient mental health care are coordinated and subject to ongoing monitoring to facilitate ongoing mental health care, including ongoing provision of prescribed medication, in the community upon discharge, even for those who have access only to temporary accommodation and those for whom ongoing accommodation has not been arranged when discharge is being facilitated
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.