Inquest into the death of A
Deceased
A
Demographics
34y, male
Date of death
2018-12-20
Finding date
2021-10-22
Cause of death
hanging
AI-generated summary
A 34-year-old man died by hanging in a correctional centre in December 2018. He was placed on a mental health waitlist in June 2018 but was never seen by a mental health nurse due to insufficient staffing—only 1.5 FTE positions serving approximately 1000 inmates. Although a psychologist noted concerning comments about suicide in his final week, a mandatory notification was not made. The coroner found this decision was defensible given clinical context, but noted the psychologist should have investigated further. Key failures included: inadequate mental health staffing, lack of communication between custodial and mental health services, lack of family-informed risk assessment, and access to hanging materials in cells. The case highlights systemic underfunding of custodial mental health services and the importance of inter-agency information sharing and family communication in suicide prevention.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- inadequate mental health staffing and waitlist delays
- failure of mental health nurse to assess patient despite referral
- insufficient inter-agency communication regarding mental health referrals
- lack of communication between family and correctional authorities about mental health concerns
- failure to conduct comprehensive risk assessment when suicidal ideation was expressed
- access to hanging materials and hanging points in cell
- immigration visa cancellation causing distress
- relationship breakdown in final week
- death of uncle in final days
- therapeutic environment design that prioritized amenity over suicide mitigation
Coroner's recommendations
- That consideration be given to reviewing Custodial Operations Policy and Procedures 3.7, including annexures 'Risk Factors for Consideration - Reference Guide' and 'Inmate Interview Questions' to determine whether the Policy should apply to psychologists and other professional mental health practitioners employed by CSNSW; and determine whether the matters referred to in the Risk Factors and Inmate Interview Questions documents currently meet the criteria for best practice to prevent suicide or self-harm of inmates. This review should also consider whether an additional risk factor be listed, namely the potential risk for self-harm posed by the inmate's current accommodation.
- That CSNSW and the Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network develop the necessary procedures and policies to ensure that referrals made by the JH Network for mental health services for inmates and the outcome of those referrals be communicated to CSNSW psychologists.
- That CSNSW and the Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network develop compatible policies and procedures to ensure that family members of inmates are able to effectively communicate their concerns about the mental health or risk of self-harm/suicide of that inmate.
- That the Ministry of Health consider the issue of funding for mental health services in Long Bay Correctional Centre, with emphasis on funding for mental health nurse positions.
Full text
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —