Coronial
NSWhospital

Inquest into the death of Bailey Mackander

Deceased

Bailey Mackander

Demographics

20y, male

Date of death

2019-11-07

Finding date

2021-12-15

Cause of death

Multiple injuries from fall from height

AI-generated summary

Bailey Mackander, a 20-year-old Wiradjuri man with substance use disorder and anxiety, died from multiple injuries after impulsively jumping an 8-metre wall at a hospital ambulance bay on 5 November 2019. He was in custody on remand, subject to a Risk Intervention Team (RIT) management plan and housed in an assessment cell. The inquest identified multiple system failures: Bailey was inappropriately placed in an assessment cell without psychological support or adequate diversionary activities; the RIT review process was defective with an untrained co-ordinator and interference from senior correctional officers; there was inadequate documentation of his distress on cell intercoms; family contact attempts were blocked; and the escort officers failed to maintain proper restraint during hospital discharge. The coroner found the assessment cell placement escalated Bailey's anxiety and panic attacks, with correctional staff using demeaning language rather than therapeutic responses. Better mental health support, least-restrictive placement options, and proper RIT procedures could have prevented this tragedy. Bailey's impulsive escape resulted from his desperation to avoid returning to the cell, not genuine escape intent.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Placement on Risk Intervention Team without adequate mental health support
  • Confinement in assessment cell with 24/7 lighting and no access to open air
  • Deprivation of diversionary activities including human contact and phone calls
  • Defective RIT review process with untrained co-ordinator
  • Senior correctional officers overriding RIT review team decisions
  • Lack of psychological intervention during cell confinement
  • Inadequate documentation of inmate distress on cell intercoms
  • Blocked family contact attempts
  • Panic attacks triggered by cell confinement
  • Escape from custody while under restraints
  • Impulsive action without awareness of 8-metre wall drop
  • Escort officer failed to maintain physical restraint during hospital discharge

Coroner's recommendations

  1. CSNSW amend RIT policy to require a psychologist or consultation with mental health provider as part of RIT review team
  2. CSNSW compile and distribute folder of specified documents to RIT members prior to review meeting
  3. CSNSW require written reasons in ISP/RIT plans for placement decisions and cell placement choices
  4. CSNSW identify responsible manager/s for inmate management on each shift in RIT plans
  5. CSNSW provide opportunity for phone calls: at ISP placement, at RIT establishment/24-hour extensions, and at discharge
  6. CSNSW inform inmates of decision, reasons, review timeline, entitlement to phone calls, and consent options for third-party communication
  7. CSNSW require RIT members to sign training acknowledgements and record meeting times
  8. CSNSW amend RIT forms to incorporate time stamps and signatures
  9. CSNSW investigate implementation of third-party support via videoconference at RIT review meetings
  10. CSNSW investigate and establish list of First Nations elders/organisations for mentorship support to RIT inmates
  11. CSNSW amend policy to communicate inmate requests to see nurse/psychologist/psychiatrist and offer 1800 Mental Health Helpline access
  12. CSNSW require hourly documentation in OIMS of observations of inmate behaviour/deterioration in assessment cells
  13. CSNSW require staff to contact Justice Health if inmate health deteriorates in assessment cell
  14. CSNSW address assessment cells at Kariong TIC - ensure fit for purpose with access to daily exercise or transfer to appropriate centre
  15. CSNSW conduct review into use of assessment cells for self-harm management and consistency with least restrictive care
  16. CSNSW develop guidance document for officers monitoring inmates on RIT in assessment cells
  17. CSNSW develop training module and guidelines for staff on communication with family members
  18. CSNSW amend Family Handbook to inform families they can provide medical/mental health information in urgent circumstances
  19. CSNSW send memorandum reminding staff that family phone calls with health information should be accepted and actioned
  20. Justice Health and CSNSW ensure websites and Families Handbook consistent regarding family contact for health information
  21. Justice Health and CSNSW convene joint working group to improve custodial mental health model of care
  22. Justice Health introduce policy for consent to communicate with third parties during ISP/RIT
  23. Justice Health provide Mental Health Helpline phone number to patients on ISP/RIT
  24. Justice Health staff receive training on effective communication with families, confidentiality boundaries, and consent processes
  25. Justice Health develop protocol to ensure mental health nurses participate in RIT reviews when available
  26. Justice Health implement priority referral system for mental health referrals in RIT Management Plans
  27. Justice Health seek legal advice on revokable enduring consent for information sharing in custody
  28. CSNSW and Justice Health notify each other when Mandatory Notification/ISP created and Justice Health nurse attends inmate
  29. Central Coast LHD and Justice Health circulate 'Who is JHFMHN' poster to NSW Health Emergency Departments
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —