Coronial
NSWcommunity

Inquest into the death of Tyrone ADAMS

Deceased

Tyrone Raymond Adams

Demographics

male

Finding date

2021-03-10

AI-generated summary

This judgment concerns procedural disclosure orders in the inquest into Tyrone Adams' death, not substantive coronial findings. Tyrone Adams died following a police pursuit of his vehicle. The coroner's decision addressed whether details of the NSW Police Safe Driving Policy (SDP) should be withheld from publication on public interest grounds. Magistrate Grahame rejected broad public interest immunity claims but made targeted non-publication orders protecting specific operational details (vehicle categories, pursuit termination procedures, tyre deflation device deployment details). The coroner found that most SDP information was either already in the public domain, widely known matters of common sense, or information whose disclosure would not materially affect offender behaviour. The substantive findings on cause of death and whether non-compliance with SDP policies contributed to the death are not included in this judgment.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Coroner may consider whether aspects of the NSW Police Safe Driving Policy require review or update following the inquest (s 82 Coroners Act 2009)
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —