Coronial
NSWcommunity

Into the death of Thomas Redman

Deceased

Thomas Redman

Demographics

18y, male

Coroner

Decision ofMagistrate Ross Hudson

Date of death

2015-12-16

Finding date

2020-01-24

Cause of death

Incised wound to right axilla with complete transection of basilic vein, brachial artery and subscapular artery causing massive haemorrhage and exsanguination

AI-generated summary

Thomas Redman, aged 18, sustained a catastrophic laceration to his right axilla involving complete transection of major arteries and veins after putting his arm through a glass window at a rural property near Gloucester, NSW on 16 December 2015. Despite appropriate pre-hospital care, retrieval, and inter-hospital management, he died approximately 4 hours after injury in a retrieval helicopter en route to John Hunter Hospital. The case presented extraordinary clinical challenges with massive uncontrollable bleeding in a remote location. Key clinical learning points include: (1) the State Retrieval Consultant should have been involved when the helicopter was initially tasked, not hours later; (2) communication failures occurred regarding aircraft refuelling and weather decision-making, with the pilot's perspective on weather constraints not directly included in the clinical teleconference; (3) whole blood and clotting factors availability in rural hospitals remains critically inadequate; and (4) protocols for early escalation to senior retrieval oversight have since been strengthened. The coroner found the clinical management reasonable given the dynamic circumstances, though some communication and coordination improvements would have been beneficial.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinetrauma surgeryvascular surgeryretrieval medicineintensive careanaesthesia

Error types

communicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

oxygenintravenous fluidsblood productstranexamic acidketamineadrenalinesedation agents

Clinical conditions

exsanguinating haemorrhagehypovolaemic shockacute blood lossvascular injurycardiac arresthypothermiatraumatic amputation

Procedures

wound packingdirect pressure applicationintravenous accessintra-osseous accessintubationresuscitationcardiopulmonary resuscitationblood transfusion

Contributing factors

  • Massive blood loss >40% of blood volume
  • Location of wound in difficult-to-compress region near major vessels
  • Limited availability of blood products and clotting factors at rural hospital
  • Remote location with significant distance to major trauma service
  • Communication breakdown regarding aircraft refuelling capability and weather constraints
  • Lack of direct pilot involvement in teleconferenced clinical decisions
  • State Retrieval Consultant not involved until several hours after helicopter tasking
  • Unavailability of whole blood and clotting factor products for retrieval services

Coroner's recommendations

  1. That the Minister for Health ensure relevant agencies including NSW Health and NSW Pathology give consideration to developing and implementing, as a matter of priority, a policy for the use of clotting factors by retrieval services (noting that clotting factors can be stored at room temperature and are widely used in Europe for this purpose)
  2. That the Minister for Health ensure relevant agencies give consideration to developing and implementing a system by which the Geolocational Blood App operates, as far as possible, allowing real time availability of up to date information as to which blood products are available at hospitals throughout NSW
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.