Coronial
NSWhospital

Inquest into the death of Madeline Newcombe

Deceased

Madeline Newcombe

Demographics

63y, female

Coroner

Decision ofDeputy State Coroner Truscott

Date of death

2015-07-21

Finding date

2020-10-02

Cause of death

Pulmonary thromboembolism

AI-generated summary

A 63-year-old woman died from pulmonary thromboembolism within 24 hours of bilateral total knee arthroplasty despite aspirin and sequential compression devices. The surgeon assessed her as standard risk and did not prescribe low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The coroner found this was a rare, ultimately unpreventable event. However, the coroner emphasised that bilateral knee replacement was not discussed with the patient as increasing thromboembolism risk, risk assessment was incomplete (not documented despite being required by guidelines), and the decision to proceed with single versus bilateral surgery should be discussed earlier in consultation rather than on the day of surgery. The coroner noted that modern multi-modal thromboprophylaxis techniques were not fully implemented and recommended these become standard practice alongside appropriate chemical prophylaxis.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

orthopaedic surgeryanaesthesiahaematology

Error types

communicationdiagnostic

Drugs involved

aspirintranexamic acidmorphine

Clinical conditions

deep vein thrombosispulmonary thromboembolismknee osteoarthritisclass 1 obesity

Procedures

total knee arthroplastygeneral anaesthesiatourniquet application

Contributing factors

  • Bilateral knee arthroplasty in single procedure
  • Class 1 obesity (BMI 31.6-33.6)
  • General anaesthetic with prolonged tourniquet use (62 minutes right leg, 59 minutes left leg)
  • Inadequate discussion of increased thromboembolism risk from bilateral surgery
  • Lack of individualised documented risk assessment by surgeon
  • Use of aspirin rather than LMWH for chemical prophylaxis
  • Lack of multi-modal thromboprophylaxis innovations

Coroner's recommendations

  1. The ASOA Guidelines should be clarified to explicitly state that bilateral knee replacement, as opposed to single knee replacement, increases the risk of venous thromboembolism and should be considered as a risk factor in the risk assessment.
  2. The ASOA Guidelines should provide a clear definition of 'marked obesity' rather than leaving it to individual interpretation.
  3. Surgeons should conduct and document individualised thromboembolism risk assessments prior to surgery, incorporating patient factors (age, fitness, weight, blood constitution) and surgical factors (single versus bilateral replacement).
  4. The discussion with patients about the choice between staged single knee replacements versus bilateral replacement in a single procedure should occur at the initial consultation, not on the day of surgery, to allow proper informed consent regarding thromboembolism risks.
  5. Multi-modal thromboprophylaxis innovations should become standard practice, including: minimisation of tourniquet use, consideration of spinal rather than general anaesthetic, use of warmed fluids, and early post-operative mobilisation.
  6. The timing of sequential compression device application should be optimised to ensure devices are applied as soon as practically possible post-operatively.
  7. The use of chemical prophylaxis (LMWH versus aspirin) for knee replacement patients should be individualised based on risk assessment and should incorporate consideration of bilateral surgery as an increased risk factor.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.