Inquest into the death of Xavier BURKE
Deceased
Xavier Burke
Demographics
15y, male
Date of death
2017-02-10
Finding date
2019-07-25
Cause of death
multiple injuries sustained in head-on collision with B-double truck during police pursuit
AI-generated summary
Xavier Burke, a 15-year-old without a driver's license, fatally collided with a B-double while driving his father's stolen utility during a 29-minute police pursuit covering 59.5 km. The pursuit was initiated based on suspicion the vehicle was a stolen Hilux, but this was disproven early on. The pursuing officers (Sergeant Goddard and Senior Constable Davison) failed to properly reassess whether the need to apprehend outweighed community risk. Critical failures included: inadequate clarification of the original offence; failure to terminate despite accumulating evidence of dangerous driving, poor vehicle control, and device use while driving; and lack of effective communication between pursuing and monitoring officers. While a blockade was attempted, non-police vehicles were inappropriately deployed. The coroner found the pursuit should have been terminated by Warrell Creek at latest. A Duty Officer later formed the correct view that termination was warranted but could not communicate it due to radio congestion, highlighting system gaps in escalation and communication protocols.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Contributing factors
- failure to clarify the specific offence justifying the pursuit
- failure to terminate pursuit despite accumulating evidence it was no longer justified
- inadequate risk assessment regarding dangerous driving by pursued vehicle
- poor communication between pursuing and monitoring officers
- radio congestion preventing critical communication of pursuit termination directive
- insufficient clarification of duties of escort officer
- use of non-police vehicles (B-double trucks) as roadblock without clear policy framework
- juvenile driver without license or training attempting to evade police at high speed
- vehicle crossing centre line and operating dangerously on rural road with limited visibility
Coroner's recommendations
- Provide further training to Communications Operators to ensure appropriate enquiries are made of involved police to clearly identify the offence that has caused a pursuit to be initiated
- Make clear in Part 7 of the Safe Driving Policy that all escorts are 'involved officers' for the purposes of section 7-2-5
- Provide clarification during standard police driver training that all escorts are 'involved officers' for the purposes of section 7-2-5
- Consider measures to make the smart push-to-talk function on police radios more broadly available and communicate its availability to police officers
- Amend section 7-6-2 of the Safe Driving Policy to include guidance on pursuit termination criteria
- Explicitly address the use of non-police vehicles (including heavy vehicles) as a road block during a pursuit, either in the Safe Driving Policy or in another appropriate policy document or guideline
- Include in standard police driver training instruction regarding the use of non-police vehicles (including heavy vehicles) as a road block during a pursuit
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —