Intestinal failure/sepsis arising from venous ischemia as a result of superior mesenteric vein division which occurred accidentally during surgical procedure
AI-generated summary
Patrick Thomas, a 52-year-old man, died from intestinal failure and sepsis following an accidental division of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) during laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer at Kareena Private Hospital on 9 October 2013. Despite emergency repair with an inferior mesenteric vein graft and transfer to Sutherland Hospital ICU, the graft occluded and his small bowel became non-viable. Critical failures included: (1) the surgeon's erroneous advice that the death need not be reported to the Coroner, resulting in incorrect death certification without coronial notification; (2) absence of Root Cause Analysis at either hospital despite this being a reportable incident; (3) lack of inter-hospital communication protocols when patients transferred between private and public facilities. The coroner found no surgical error in technique but identified systemic failures in hospital governance, review processes, and communication that prevented proper investigation of the adverse outcome.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
colon cancer with metastasessuperior mesenteric vein divisionvenous ischemiaintestinal failuresepsisbowel obstruction
Procedures
laparoscopic right hemicolectomyconversion to open surgeryemergency laparotomyvascular graft (inferior mesenteric vein)ileostomymultiple re-look laparotomiesVAC dressing application
Contributing factors
Accidental division of superior mesenteric vein during laparoscopic colectomy
Tumour distortion of normal vascular anatomy
Failure to report death to Coroner despite meeting reportable death criteria
Incorrect death certification without coronial notification
Absence of Root Cause Analysis at either hospital
Lack of inter-hospital communication protocols between private and public facilities
No formal notification process between hospitals when patient transferred for escalated care
Surgeon's misunderstanding of coronial reporting obligations
Closure of Kareena Private Hospital records before patient outcome known
Inadequate surgical documentation of the complication
Coroner's recommendations
That where a patient transferred for care from a private health facility dies in Sutherland Hospital, there be a written protocol providing for: (a) notification of the death to the Director of Clinical Services/General Manager of the private health facility from which the patient was transferred; (b) notification by the Director of Clinical Services at Sutherland Hospital to the LHD Director of Clinical Governance for consideration of action under the NSW Health 'Incident Management Policy'
That where a patient transferred for care from a public health facility dies in Kareena Private Hospital, there be a written protocol providing for: (a) notification of the death to the General Manager/Chief Executive of the public health facility from which the patient was transferred; (b) communication between the Director of Clinical Services of Kareena Private Hospital and Director of Clinical Services of the public health facility as to whether follow up review is required, who is responsible and what resources should be shared
Where a transfer for escalated care follows surgery, the surgeon must complete and sign a transfer document, outlining the nature of the operation, the complication (if any) and reasons for transfer
That Kareena Private Hospital implement training and education regarding the requirement of a Root Cause Analysis be conducted
That Kareena Private Hospital implement training and education regarding the requirement to notify a Coroner of a death
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.