Septicaemia secondary to Neisseria meningitides infection
AI-generated summary
Naomi Williams, a 27-year-old Wiradjuri woman, died from meningococcal septicaemia on 1 January 2016. She presented to Tumut Hospital in the early hours with generalised aches and pains while pregnant. Despite vital signs concerning for infection (tachycardia 120bpm, hypotension 90/50mmHg), she was discharged after 34 minutes with only paracetamol, without medical review, proper pain assessment, or fetal examination. Prior to this, she had made 18+ presentations over 7 months with vomiting, abdominal pain and dehydration, but received symptomatic treatment only—no gastroenterology referral or specialist escalation despite expert opinion that this was warranted. Her low expectations of care, shaped by feeling stereotyped as a drug user and unheard, likely contributed to delayed re-presentation after discharge. Had she been observed longer, reviewed by a doctor, and had prior specialist investigation occurred, meningococcal sepsis might have been detected and treated earlier with antibiotics.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
meningococcal septicaemianeisseria meningitides infectionseptic shockgeneralised aches and painshypotensiontachycardiapregnancy at 6 months gestationhyperemesis gravidarumhigh-risk pregnancyhelicobacter pylori infectionrecurrent gastroenteritisdehydrationcannabis use
Contributing factors
Failure to escalate care despite multiple presentations with same symptoms over 7 months
No medical officer review at final presentation despite abnormal vital signs and pregnancy
Inadequate assessment of generalised pain in pregnant patient
No fetal assessment despite 6-month pregnancy
No specialist (gastroenterology or obstetric) referral for complex, recurrent symptoms
Hospital notes not reviewed at final presentation
High-risk pregnancy status not flagged in system despite documented assessment 2 weeks prior
Lack of investigation into causes of recurrent vomiting and abdominal pain
Brief 34-minute ED stay insufficient for observation and diagnosis
Implicit racial bias and stereotyping as drug user affecting care quality
Patient low expectations of care shaped by prior dismissive treatment
No Aboriginal Liaison Officer involvement despite multiple presentations
Coroner's recommendations
Provide training to all staff about safety alerts (re-presentation calls for medical review, high-risk pregnancy flags) and implement consistent alert implementation methods
Implement Nurse Directed Emergency Care (NDEC) policy as a matter of urgency
Strengthen Aboriginal Health Liaison Worker program by ensuring 24-hour availability and ensuring staff know that NSW Health Policy Notification/referral of Aboriginal Inpatients applies to ED presentations as well as admissions
Adopt targets within MLHD for employment and retention of Indigenous health care professionals at least equivalent to proportion of Indigenous residents in local area
Audit implicit bias by recording statistics for Indigenous and non-Indigenous patient triage categories, discharge against medical advice, triage times, and referrals for drug and alcohol reviews
Identify other assessment tools to measure existence of implicit bias in health care provision and make such tools available to Tumut Hospital
Establish targets for proportionate representation of Indigenous people (by population and no fewer than two) on Local Health Advisory Committee and MLHD Board
Establish ongoing consultation process with HEAL Mawang Group to develop local model for culturally safe health care in line with Hunter New England Health initiatives
Seek immediate consultation with Hunter New England Health regarding strategies for developing culturally appropriate care
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.