Coronial
NSWcommunity

Mokmool

Deceased

Danukul Mokmool

Demographics

30y, male

Date of death

2017-07-26

Finding date

2019-08-05

Cause of death

gunshot wound to the head as a result of a police operation

AI-generated summary

Danukul Mokmool, aged 30, died on 26 July 2017 after being shot by NSW Police at Central Railway Station following a mental health crisis. He was experiencing acute psychosis with paranoid delusions that his family intended to harm him. After calling emergency services, he assaulted a florist with broken glass, then armed himself with scissors from the shop and engaged in self-harm while smashing property. When police arrived, he ran directly at officers carrying scissors in both hands. Two officers discharged their firearms, which the coroner found was justified within NSW Police policy and training. The inquest identified that the responding officer positioned himself closer than advisably, limiting de-escalation opportunities, though rapid escalation made assessment difficult. A critical finding was that uniformed officers had not complied with Standard Operating Procedures mandating Taser carriage. The coroner recommended that frontline uniformed officers be required to carry a Taser absent good reason not to.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • acute psychotic episode
  • paranoid delusions regarding family threat
  • armed with scissors/bladed weapons
  • rapid escalation of situation
  • limited de-escalation opportunity due to short timeframe
  • officer tactical positioning too close to subject

Coroner's recommendations

  1. That consideration be given to amending the applicable Standard Operating Procedures so that uniformed officers performing frontline duties are required to carry a Taser absent good reason not to.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —