Inquest into the disappearance and suspected death of Luxing Li
Deceased
Luxing Li
Demographics
28y, male
Date of death
2017-10-18
Finding date
2019-04-03
Cause of death
unknown
AI-generated summary
This inquest concerned a 28-year-old man who disappeared on 18 October 2017 from the Skillion, a coastal cliff location known as a suicide site near Terrigal, NSW. The coroner found he died on or soon after that date in or near the waters at the Skillion, but could not establish the cause or manner of death. He had recently failed an accounting exam for the third time and sent a final text suggesting emotional distress, but had no documented mental health history. The coroner noted CCTV cameras and increased fencing have since been installed at the location. This case highlights limitations in determining death circumstances when bodies are not recovered and illustrates the ongoing impact on families when critical questions remain unanswered.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Contributing factors
academic failure - third failure of accounting unit
stress related to examination performance
possible mental health crisis
environmental risk - Skillion cliff location known as suicide site
possible natural event such as cardiac event or fall
Coroner's recommendations
Installation of CCTV cameras at the top of the Skillion and at its base, monitored at Gosford Police Station
Increase in the height of the fence at the top of the Skillion to reduce suicide deaths at the location
Police to obtain DNA sample from deceased's belongings for potential future identification
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —