Coronial
NSWhome

Inquest into the deaths of Diane Michel and John McCain

Deceased

Diane Michel and John McCain

Demographics

unknown

Date of death

2016-12-05

Finding date

2018-08-06

Cause of death

Diane Michel: sharp force injuries to neck and wrists. John McCain: projectile injuries to chest.

AI-generated summary

A married couple, both terminally ill with COPD and other serious conditions, died together at home in December 2016. Diane Michel (74) died from sharp force injuries to her neck and wrists; John McCain (76) died from self-inflicted projectile injuries. The coroner found evidence of a mutual decision to end their lives together rather than face prolonged suffering or hospitalisation. John had refused further medical treatment and home palliative care. The coroner found no deficiency in their care or inadequacy of palliative services. This case highlights the importance of understanding patient preferences regarding end-of-life care, recognising when patients have decided against medical intervention, and ensuring comprehensive advance care planning discussions with terminally ill patients and their families.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • terminal illness with limited life expectancy
  • severe COPD and respiratory failure
  • vascular disease and cardiac disease
  • acute renal failure
  • physical frailty and inability to care for each other
  • patient refusal of further medical treatment
  • patient refusal of home palliative care services
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —