Coronial
NSWother

Inquest into the death of Andrew Amos

Deceased

Andrew Amos

Demographics

30y, male

Date of death

2015-01-24

Finding date

2015-10-05

Cause of death

ischaemic heart disease

AI-generated summary

Andrew Amos, a 30-year-old male prisoner, died of ischaemic heart disease on 24 January 2015. He had significant coronary artery disease (≥90% left anterior descending artery stenosis) with no preceding scarring suggesting previous infarction. Although he reported irregular heartbeat and heart medication use in 2004, subsequent medical records did not document cardiac disease. A cardiologist reviewing his complete medical history concluded there was no prior indication of coronary heart disease that should have been detected. He presented acutely with chest and back pain at 6pm and collapsed within one hour. Prison staff responded appropriately with immediate CPR and emergency services. The coroner found no basis for concluding that earlier cardiac screening should have been initiated. Death was natural and not preventable based on available clinical information.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • significant coronary artery disease with ≥90% left anterior descending artery stenosis
  • obesity
  • heavy smoking
  • sedentary lifestyle
  • previous report of irregular heartbeat in 2004 not investigated further
  • acute presentation with rapid deterioration
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —