Coronial
NSWhospital

Inquest into the death of Margaret Ann Pegum

Deceased

Margaret Ann Pegum

Demographics

67y, female

Coroner

Decision ofDeputy State Coroner Ryan

Date of death

2015-07-06

Finding date

2018-04-26

Cause of death

Sepsis as a result of gastric perforation

AI-generated summary

Margaret Pegum, aged 67, died from sepsis following gastric perforation after an intragastric balloon (IGB) procedure for weight loss. She had undergone fundoplication for hiatus hernia in 2012. Despite prior gastric surgery being an absolute contraindication to IGB placement—clearly documented in manufacturer instructions and peer-reviewed literature—Dr Marinos proceeded with the procedure based on assumptions about risk mitigation that were unsupported by evidence. Post-procedure care was also deficient: written discharge instructions created ambiguity about when to seek help, leading to delayed presentation when she developed severe vomiting on 23 June 2015. The coroner found Dr Marinos' decision represented significant error in judgement. Earlier medical contact on 23 June, when symptoms developed, would likely have enhanced her survival chances. The coroner noted no formal recommendations were necessary given Dr Marinos' subsequent practice improvements, but made broader recommendations for professional guidelines and a bariatric outcomes registry.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

gastroenterologybariatric surgeryemergency medicinegeneral surgery

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Clinical conditions

Morbid obesity (Class III, BMI 46)Gastric perforationSepsisMultiorgan failureGastric ischaemiaSleep apnoeaSeizuresHypertensionAnxietyGastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Procedures

Intragastric balloon insertionIntragastric balloon inflationEndoscopic balloon removalEmergency gastric perforation repair surgery

Contributing factors

  • Prior gastric surgery (fundoplication) listed as absolute contraindication to IGB but procedure proceeded
  • Severe vomiting and retching following balloon inflation causing increased intragastric pressure
  • Intragastric balloon presence reducing stomach space and exacerbating vomiting
  • Possible role of prior fundoplication altering gastric function and ability to expel gas
  • Severe dehydration from protracted vomiting prior to hospital presentation
  • Lack of clarity in post-procedure discharge instructions regarding when to contact physician
  • Absence of proactive follow-up contact from medical team on 23 June despite high-risk status
  • Possible scarring and adhesions from prior gastric surgery acting as fixed point during vomiting-induced contractions

Coroner's recommendations

  1. That the Australian and New Zealand Metabolic and Obesity Surgery Society consider developing guidelines concerning intragastric balloon procedures covering patient selection and exclusion criteria, indications and contraindications, risks, and appropriate follow up care and advice.
  2. That the Australian and New Zealand Metabolic and Obesity Surgery Society consider compiling a data registry with details and outcomes for all bariatric patients, aimed at providing clinicians and prospective patients with evidence-based information to guide decisions about the various bariatric options.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.