Inquest into the death of Brendan Vickery
Deceased
Brendan Vickery
Demographics
20y, male
Date of death
2014-02-23
Finding date
2018-04-11
Cause of death
drowning
AI-generated summary
Brendan Vickery, a 20-year-old, died by drowning in a quarry reservoir after jumping from a cliff. He was an adequate swimmer who appeared fit and well before jumping. After his initial jump, witnesses observed him expressing fatigue and difficulty swimming, despite having been a good swimmer. Evidence suggests he likely inhaled water while treading water near the cliff face shortly after his jump. While the coroner found drowning to be the cause of death on balance of probabilities, expert evidence indicated possible contributing internal injuries from the jump impact (pneumothorax or internal bleeding) that could have caused weakness and exhaustion. The inquest did not identify clinically preventable factors, though it focused on environmental safety measures. No medical intervention was possible given the recreational setting and delayed discovery.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Contributing factors
- recreational cliff jumping from height of 5-8 metres
- fatigue or weakness post-jump possibly from impact injury
- difficulty swimming back to shore despite being capable swimmer
- inadequate fencing and signage to prevent trespassing
- laboured breathing and loss of buoyancy after jump
- possible internal injury from impact with water
Full text
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —