Coronial
NSWhospital

Inquest into the death of Alexander Costello

Deceased

Alexander Costello

Demographics

37y, male

Coroner

Decision ofState Coroner Mabbutt

Date of death

2016-04-09

Finding date

2018-11-09

Cause of death

Haemopericardium secondary to aortic dissection

AI-generated summary

Alexander Costello, 37, presented to Gunnedah Hospital ED with acute onset severe chest pain, back pain, diaphoresis and nausea. Dr G., the sole ED physician, conducted initial assessment including ECG and troponin testing, both normal. He diagnosed gastritis and admitted for observation. Costello collapsed in shower that evening and died from Type A aortic dissection with haemopericardium. The coroner found several failures in clinical care: family history of aortic dissection was inadequately documented despite being communicated; aortic dissection was not considered as a differential diagnosis despite being listed in the NSW Chest Pain Pathway; clinical notes lacked timestamps and detail; the Chest Pain Pathway was not appropriately utilised. The coroner concluded that at 3:30pm, after negative troponin results, aortic dissection should have been considered and transfer to Tamworth arranged. However, even with optimal transfer and surgical management, Costello likely would not have survived given the complexity of Type A dissection repair. Key learning: maintain high index of suspicion for aortic dissection in acute severe chest/back pain; properly document family history; systematically consider differential diagnoses including rare but catastrophic conditions.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinegeneral practicecardiothoracic surgerycardiology

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystem

Drugs involved

morphinemetoclopramidehyoscine butylbromidemetoclopramideanginineaspirin

Clinical conditions

aortic dissectionhaemopericardiumcardiac tamponadechest painacute myocardial infarction

Procedures

electrocardiographyblood sampling for troponinintravenous access

Contributing factors

  • Failure to consider aortic dissection in differential diagnosis despite it being featured in NSW Chest Pain Pathway
  • Inadequate documentation of family history of aortic dissection communicated by family members
  • Clinical notes lacked timestamps and detailed history of pain onset and character
  • Chest Pain Pathway not appropriately utilised or followed
  • Failure to arrange transfer to tertiary centre despite continuing severe chest pain after negative troponin
  • Inadequate staff training and understanding of Chest Pain Pathway responsibilities at Gunnedah Hospital
  • No formal sign-off or completion documentation of Chest Pain Pathway assessment
  • Misinterpretation of improving pain levels and patient mobilisation as indicators of clinical improvement when pain remained severe and unresolved

Coroner's recommendations

  1. All nursing and medical staff who perform duties at Gunnedah Hospital Emergency Department are to be reminded as part of their induction and ongoing training of the importance of clinical use of the NSW Health Chest Pain Pathway
  2. All staff to receive training regarding their specific roles and responsibilities in the use of the Chest Pain Pathway
  3. Audits to be performed at Gunnedah Hospital to ensure compliance with Chest Pain Pathway recommendations
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.