David Veech, aged 35, died of accidental Fentanyl toxicity while residing at Tarlo Intensive Residential Support Service. He extracted Fentanyl from prescribed transdermal patches and injected it intravenously. Despite being in a facility designed to provide 24-hour supervision, David accessed medication through an insecure cupboard and was inadequately supervised, particularly overnight when staff failed to conduct required two-hourly checks. He had a history of substance abuse, drug-seeking behaviour, and multiple medications. While his GP appropriately prescribed Fentanyl after confirmed rib fractures and exhausted other options, he lacked knowledge of Fentanyl abuse methods. Critical failings included: minimal staff training on drug seeking behaviour and Fentanyl dangers; poor medication security; inadequate coordination between agencies (mental health, community health, probation); failure to provide drug and alcohol rehabilitation despite clear indication it was urgent; and staff fear affecting supervision. No specific drug and alcohol counselling was provided despite multiple opportunities.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Inadequate supervision of resident in residential care facility
Insecure medication storage and access controls
Failure to implement required twice-hourly night checks from behaviour support plan
Lack of staff training on drug-seeking behaviour and Fentanyl abuse methods
Failure to provide drug and alcohol rehabilitation services despite urgent clinical indication
Poor inter-agency coordination between Lifestyle Solutions, Goulburn Community Health Centre, mental health services, and probation and parole
Inappropriate placement in intensive residential support without prior detoxification
Staff fear and avoidance of supervision due to perceived threat from resident
Poor shift handover procedures and documentation
Lack of communication between GP and clinical psychologist regarding Fentanyl prescription
Insecure office environment with unlocked doors and restricted access
Inadequate staffing ratios for two residents with known drug-seeking behaviour
Absence of protocol for safe disposal of transdermal patches
Unreliable drug screening (unsupervised urine test)
Coroner's recommendations
Southern NSW Local Health District to liaise with NSW Health to provide copy of findings and seek urgent consideration of need for increased capacity for residential drug and alcohol rehabilitation beds in NSW, particularly for patients exiting criminal justice system with history of aggression, ambivalent response to treatment, or known lack of insight, and patients with mental health diagnosis
Lifestyle Solutions to action each of the changes referred to in the document headed 'Systems Changes and Acknowledgements Arising from the Inquest and Agreed to by Lifestyle Solutions' according to the timetable foreshadowed, including: policy on disposal of transdermal patches; policy on management of drug-seeking behaviour; policy ensuring clinical psychologist awareness of prescription medication changes; policy requiring clinical psychologist review and approval of behavioural support plan changes; policy ensuring treating doctor informed of person's circumstances; policy on improving communication with relevant agencies including case management meetings; appropriate key registers in all residential care facilities
Lifestyle Solutions to conduct an audit of Tarlo IRS in 12 months from inquest to gauge whether lasting change and improvements in training have been achieved
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.