Inquest into the disappearance and suspected death of Alan LY
Deceased
Alan Ly
Demographics
25y, male
Date of death
2015-09-22
Finding date
2017-08-08
Cause of death
Unable to be determined
AI-generated summary
Alan Ly, aged 25, disappeared on 22 September 2015 and is presumed dead. Evidence strongly suggests suicide: a handwritten note expressing long-standing suicidal ideation, recent paternal suicide, sleep disturbance, financial stress, and out-of-character gifting of possessions and money to family members. His mobile phone was last traced to Watsons Bay near 'The Gap' (a known suicide location). No body was recovered and the specific cause and manner of death could not be determined. Clinical lessons: recognise suicide risk in those bereaved by parental suicide, particularly with pre-existing sleep disruption, hopelessness about mental health treatment, and recent psychosocial stressors. Early intervention by mental health services following paternal suicide may have been beneficial.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Recent paternal suicide
- Sleep disturbance for approximately 1.5 months prior to disappearance
- Family disagreement over deceased father's estate
- Cancellation of planned trip to Japan
- Long-standing suicidal ideation
- Expressed belief that mental health problems had no permanent fix
- Reluctance to pursue medication for mental health issues
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —