Coronial
NSWhospital

Inquest into the death of Audrey MacGREGOR

Deceased

Audrey Winifred MacGregor

Demographics

88y, female

Coroner

Decision ofDeputy State Coroner Grahame

Date of death

2013-10-24

Finding date

2016-10-26

Cause of death

combined effects of an overdose of hydromorphone and complications of pneumonia (following treatment for chronic clostridium difficile colitis) against a background of heart disease and lung disease

AI-generated summary

An 88-year-old woman with chronic lung disease, heart disease, and recent pneumonia following faecal transplant for clostridium difficile colitis was prescribed 0.5 mg hydromorphone subcutaneously for respiratory distress on 24 October 2013. Two nurses unfamiliar with hydromorphone administered a 10-fold overdose (5 mg instead of 0.5 mg), mistaking the dose unit from milligrams to millilitres and confusing it with morphine. The patient rapidly lost consciousness and died hours later. Contributing factors included inadequate communication with family, lack of staff familiarity with the drug, absence of visual warnings distinguishing hydromorphone from morphine and high-potency versions, and delayed recognition of overdose signs by nursing staff. The coroner found the overdose contributed to death alongside pneumonia and underlying cardiopulmonary disease.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

cardiologyrespiratory medicineintensive caregastroenterologypalliative care

Error types

medicationcommunicationsystem

Drugs involved

hydromorphonemorphinenaloxone

Clinical conditions

hydromorphone toxicityopioid overdosepneumoniaclostridium difficile colitisheart failureaortic valve stenosischronic lung diseaseacute renal failurerespiratory distressrespiratory depressionhypoxic ischemic encephalopathy

Procedures

colonoscopyfaecal transplant

Contributing factors

  • medication error: tenfold overdose of hydromorphone due to confusion of dosing units (milligrams vs millilitres)
  • staff unfamiliarity with hydromorphone pharmacology and dosing
  • lack of visual distinction between hydromorphone and morphine ampoules
  • lack of visual distinction between different concentration strengths of hydromorphone
  • inadequate pharmacy guidance to nursing staff about drug potency differences
  • inadequate post-injection monitoring and failure to recognise overdose signs promptly
  • poor communication between medical staff and family regarding clinical deterioration and pain management
  • lack of formal palliative care planning despite clinical decline
  • previous day's medication error (morphine given instead of hydromorphone) indicating systemic confusion

Coroner's recommendations

  1. NSW Department of Health should conduct an audit of its High Risk Medicines Management Policy to ascertain what practices and procedures have been implemented by Local Drug and Therapeutic Committees regarding hydromorphone (part 3.2)
  2. NSW Department of Health should strengthen its High Risk Medicines Management Policy in relation to hydromorphone and mandate that the drug must be referred to as HYDROmorphine Dilaudid or Dilaudid (not merely 'should') by all hospital staff including prescribers, nurses and pharmacists
  3. NSW Department of Health should issue another Safety Notice (in addition to SA 004/11) reinforcing to all staff the potential confusions between morphine and hydromorphone and the confusions resulting from differing concentrations of the drugs, with a mandated education component
  4. NSW Department of Health should investigate options available through the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for restricting the use of different sized/coloured ampoules and/or bottles to minimise confusion between lower and higher potency strengths of hydromorphone
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.