Inquest into the death of Sheila Drysdale
Deceased
Sheila Drysdale
Demographics
75y, female
Date of death
2013-12-20
Finding date
2016-07-15
Cause of death
hypovolaemic shock following uncontrolled blood loss from mini-liposuction stem cell procedure performed when anticoagulant medication had not been ceased
AI-generated summary
A 75-year-old woman with advanced frontal lobe dementia died from hypovolaemic shock following uncontrolled bleeding after an unproven stem-cell liposuction procedure. Critical failures included: failure to cease anticoagulants (aspirin, krill oil) 7-10 days preoperatively despite their documented use; inadequate pre-operative assessment; failure to recognise haemodynamic instability (dropping blood pressure, rising heart rate); premature discharge rather than emergency hospital admission; and inadequate informed consent for an experimental procedure with no established scientific basis for dementia treatment. The coroner found this preventable death highlighted exploitation of vulnerable elderly patients, lack of regulatory oversight of experimental procedures, and insufficient clinical escalation despite clear warning signs.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Anticoagulant medications (aspirin, krill oil) not ceased preoperatively despite requirement for 7-10 day cessation
- Failure to verify anticoagulant cessation on day of procedure despite medication chart being available
- Inadequate pre-operative assessment and lack of consultation with general practitioner
- Failure to recognise haemodynamic instability (declining blood pressure, rising heart rate indicating blood loss)
- Assumption that low blood pressure was normal post-operative response rather than sign of shock
- Premature discharge to nursing home rather than emergency hospital admission
- Unproven experimental procedure with no scientific basis for treating dementia
- Inadequate informed consent process and consent form
- Failure of nursing home staff to escalate despite concerning vital signs
- Deference to physician authority despite family and nursing concerns
Coroner's recommendations
- Health Care Complaints Commission to investigate Dr B.'s conduct in this case
- Therapeutic Goods Administration (Commonwealth) and NSW Ministry of Health to consider managing and regulating experimental or innovative medical procedures not yet approved following clinical trials or peer-reviewed evaluation, with priority given to conflicts of interest and informed consent
- National Health and Medical Research Council and NSW Clinical Excellence Commission to formulate guidelines and protocols ensuring experimental or innovative procedures conform with scientifically respectable clinical practice
- Cosmetic Physicians College of Australasia to formulate guidelines and protocols for experimental or innovative medical procedures, with priority to conflicts of interest and informed consent
- Macquarie Stem Cells to develop and introduce pre-operative preparation checklist for patients and carers including verification of anticoagulant cessation 7-10 days before procedure
- Macquarie Stem Cells to develop internal checklist ensuring all pre-operative preparations completed before invasive procedures commence
- Macquarie Stem Cells to undertake no invasive procedures unless satisfied pre-operative preparations completed
- Macquarie Stem Cells to amend consent form to detail procedure, alternatives, risks and benefits in sufficient detail for informed consent
- Leading Age Services Australia and Royal Australian College of Physicians to develop and implement patient observation chart (Between the Flags type protocols) for nursing homes with individualised patient baselines
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —